From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
Received: by sourceware.org (Postfix, from userid 48)
 id 0411D3864858; Tue, 18 Aug 2020 07:49:52 +0000 (GMT)
DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 sourceware.org 0411D3864858
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gcc.gnu.org;
 s=default; t=1597736993;
 bh=NjrKqHw0nKy3+sRJZ6FkET+hNbnt5kFJb6xg0fU9UqU=;
 h=From:To:Subject:Date:In-Reply-To:References:From;
 b=PFE2vbMKwAOXdMlnULbK+iK4XV7AsUO+YG/Z/JsFx0NuJ08SJRRNVCsdWuDLrP4A8
 bf8YcBnHZEbGPc2bbhhxYenirOToPieH63JyNIUkPl9v8t9EZfZ0DkorG5i26a8Glf
 MfFA0mgFN8QM7nv9pkIBe7vTPMAm3oxow4KzPvtM=
From: "dev at hrookami dot icu" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug c++/96645] [9/10/11 Regression] std::variant default constructor
Date: Tue, 18 Aug 2020 07:49:52 +0000
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC
X-Bugzilla-Type: changed
X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None
X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc
X-Bugzilla-Component: c++
X-Bugzilla-Version: 9.0
X-Bugzilla-Keywords: rejects-valid
X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal
X-Bugzilla-Who: dev at hrookami dot icu
X-Bugzilla-Status: NEW
X-Bugzilla-Resolution: 
X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3
X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: ---
X-Bugzilla-Flags: 
X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: 
Message-ID: <bug-96645-4-TWe1bq3M1t@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
In-Reply-To: <bug-96645-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
References: <bug-96645-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-BeenThere: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Gcc-bugs mailing list <gcc-bugs.gcc.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://gcc.gnu.org/mailman/options/gcc-bugs>,
 <mailto:gcc-bugs-request@gcc.gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://gcc.gnu.org/pipermail/gcc-bugs/>
List-Post: <mailto:gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gcc-bugs-request@gcc.gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://gcc.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/gcc-bugs>,
 <mailto:gcc-bugs-request@gcc.gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 18 Aug 2020 07:49:53 -0000

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D96645

--- Comment #5 from Sergey <dev at hrookami dot icu> ---
(In reply to Jonathan Wakely from comment #4)
> And libc++'s std::variant is still affected by the same issue, but instead
> of the default constructor being deleted it just has the wrong exception
> specification:
>=20

Should I report the issue in clang bugtracker?=