From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: by sourceware.org (Postfix, from userid 48) id 95412386102F; Mon, 17 Aug 2020 18:10:21 +0000 (GMT) DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 sourceware.org 95412386102F DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gcc.gnu.org; s=default; t=1597687821; bh=XMeYIVCITpzxEIM25j5bEXlJM/NOBuMoAys/gBDsI/0=; h=From:To:Subject:Date:In-Reply-To:References:From; b=nprT5dtZLBPfMqOY2BI3TOOSKEAH5M8owOdRWiHPFelh6g69mVgTQvk4K5I0MTGsc fSljbbMlcYif6aIaSU2qqOLnt7ai+Ntwb0fZd0jJ7zC2bbeYr8XbUfO0zVkgMmD5vF QMNiJqvl74rZi+U/+wxKG025dkU2q2Gn3QbwSrUM= From: "burnus at gcc dot gnu.org" To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org Subject: [Bug libgomp/96661] configure:16984: error: unsupported system, cannot find Fortran int kind=16 Date: Mon, 17 Aug 2020 18:10:21 +0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC X-Bugzilla-Type: changed X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc X-Bugzilla-Component: libgomp X-Bugzilla-Version: 11.0 X-Bugzilla-Keywords: X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal X-Bugzilla-Who: burnus at gcc dot gnu.org X-Bugzilla-Status: UNCONFIRMED X-Bugzilla-Resolution: X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3 X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: --- X-Bugzilla-Flags: X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated MIME-Version: 1.0 X-BeenThere: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Gcc-bugs mailing list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 17 Aug 2020 18:10:21 -0000 https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D96661 --- Comment #1 from Tobias Burnus --- (In reply to John David Anglin from comment #0) > Guess this is because target doesn't support int128. For "omp depend", the OpenMP spec requires that an integer type is used =E2= =80=93 and the libgomp implementation uses two pointer [=3D 2*sizeof(void*)] for this. If (as I assume) hppa64-hp-hpux11.11 uses 64bit pointers, this indeed means that in128 is needed. In principle, OpenMP should have used some opaque data type (user-defined derived type). But as they didn't think of this when specifying the data ty= pe and the best choice for the implementation in GCC was to have storage for t= wo pointers, I now have this problem. I do not see an easy way out; we had the same issue before with GCN and the= re the solution was to add support for int128, cf. PR 96306. > For the most part, libgomp used to work on this target. Probably still the case when ignoring the 'depend' feature in Fortran...=