From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: by sourceware.org (Postfix, from userid 48) id B1A863844072; Tue, 18 Aug 2020 17:02:01 +0000 (GMT) DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 sourceware.org B1A863844072 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gcc.gnu.org; s=default; t=1597770121; bh=WV+XUMZqvM5aZ0ZRvZlooBcEVxTG9eCbAODn+RaIL/M=; h=From:To:Subject:Date:In-Reply-To:References:From; b=CLOOCfU/rcog3CKgOBGRiDS56rTOZRMTKHUFnTbSWduwtZRweyRKOAn5YioRc7/Eg G4FOLr3dQYrkUQHiFm717NF2t0XAfd2g5hb45MpUL7B5dU8VXasd0K+tlh1waepDkB O8f22NwLrrT3g1Lzs99kZDTgzqrJJuIYG3213tK0= From: "burnus at gcc dot gnu.org" To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org Subject: [Bug fortran/96668] [OpenMP] Re-mapping allocated but previously unallocated allocatable does not work Date: Tue, 18 Aug 2020 17:02:01 +0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC X-Bugzilla-Type: changed X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc X-Bugzilla-Component: fortran X-Bugzilla-Version: 11.0 X-Bugzilla-Keywords: openmp, wrong-code X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal X-Bugzilla-Who: burnus at gcc dot gnu.org X-Bugzilla-Status: UNCONFIRMED X-Bugzilla-Resolution: X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3 X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: --- X-Bugzilla-Flags: X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated MIME-Version: 1.0 X-BeenThere: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Gcc-bugs mailing list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 18 Aug 2020 17:02:01 -0000 https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D96668 --- Comment #4 from Tobias Burnus --- (In reply to kargl from comment #3) > > integer, pointer :: p1 =3D> null() > > integer, pointer :: p1 =3D> null() > Module m looks wrong. Should the 2nd p1 be p2? It should be "p2(:)" (Thanks. I wrote it in the browser without cross checking =E2=80=93 and as = I planed to do it, the VMware had disk access issues. Thus, I just hit 'submit' while t= he browser was still running. Hence, there might be additional issues. I also planned to enumerate the 'stop 1'.)=