From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: by sourceware.org (Postfix, from userid 48) id 20D193851C04; Tue, 25 Aug 2020 12:47:05 +0000 (GMT) DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 sourceware.org 20D193851C04 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gcc.gnu.org; s=default; t=1598359625; bh=o+q06iGvY40pwbAopiHCyj7hLTIvm0L8ZYsASdCf0r0=; h=From:To:Subject:Date:In-Reply-To:References:From; b=FOBWbp+dem9pbb3P04uRFVm4sfMejiJ7q51+UQSbrs1vd2eNeSrHg+DFp+olInx2B 38FIRJRaapWprfCR+s3dE7WeA4Kjr6Md8YRDywgOySNl6febqiBr0XORahm5OcBxYy j0p41Pj3M929a3QKEDV2Suusqp6hUo/El7R4f3C0= From: "rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org" To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org Subject: [Bug tree-optimization/96693] [11 Regression] GCC produces incorrect code with -O2 for loops Date: Tue, 25 Aug 2020 12:47:04 +0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC X-Bugzilla-Type: changed X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc X-Bugzilla-Component: tree-optimization X-Bugzilla-Version: 11.0 X-Bugzilla-Keywords: wrong-code X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal X-Bugzilla-Who: rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org X-Bugzilla-Status: RESOLVED X-Bugzilla-Resolution: DUPLICATE X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3 X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: 11.0 X-Bugzilla-Flags: X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: resolution bug_status Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated MIME-Version: 1.0 X-BeenThere: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Gcc-bugs mailing list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 25 Aug 2020 12:47:05 -0000 https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D96693 Richard Biener changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Resolution|--- |DUPLICATE Status|ASSIGNED |RESOLVED --- Comment #3 from Richard Biener --- Actually the same as PR96760, too. *** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of bug 96760 ***=