From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: by sourceware.org (Postfix, from userid 48) id 38455386103E; Mon, 24 Aug 2020 08:51:53 +0000 (GMT) DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 sourceware.org 38455386103E DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gcc.gnu.org; s=default; t=1598259113; bh=L2IXh1G0pWgu3kTod2mtDwDK4tzRNrdi6vVjF918omw=; h=From:To:Subject:Date:In-Reply-To:References:From; b=cRJZwsbO3d5+KLCExZWQ57zmkkIAIiiOvAwKpzfyFa9JQ/Bemw0J7ExKaCy1IRQF8 XBJC5uu8fJ1tGrlKSOWKEj6FM64XGAKKn60HAsxPe1qPRg3fXHFrJ3kMwA8le8Atzo CptYMmsKOHdJCrB1qix3pw6HTxsETZ3oUXt6qawc= From: "manuel.lauss at googlemail dot com" To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org Subject: [Bug tree-optimization/96748] ICE in get_default_value, at tree-ssa-ccp.c:311 Date: Mon, 24 Aug 2020 08:51:53 +0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC X-Bugzilla-Type: changed X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc X-Bugzilla-Component: tree-optimization X-Bugzilla-Version: 10.2.1 X-Bugzilla-Keywords: ice-on-valid-code X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal X-Bugzilla-Who: manuel.lauss at googlemail dot com X-Bugzilla-Status: RESOLVED X-Bugzilla-Resolution: INVALID X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3 X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: --- X-Bugzilla-Flags: X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated MIME-Version: 1.0 X-BeenThere: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Gcc-bugs mailing list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 24 Aug 2020 08:51:53 -0000 https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D96748 --- Comment #5 from Manuel Lauss --- (In reply to Martin Li=C5=A1ka from comment #4) > I don't see the failure for any of recent GCC releases: >=20 > Releases > 8.1.0 (406c2abec3f998e9)(02 May 2018 10:13): [took: 4.858s] result: OK > 8.2.0 (ddeb81e76461fc00)(26 Jul 2018 09:47): [took: 4.871s] result: OK > 8.3.0 (4c44b708f11eec6f)(22 Feb 2019 14:20): [took: 4.913s] result: OK > 8.4.0 (8cd3bffead2ed1d1)(04 Mar 2020 08:30): [took: 4.821s] result: OK > 9.1.0 (c8913260b0756f97)(03 May 2019 07:59): [took: 4.729s] result: OK > 9.2.0 (a0c06cc27d2146b7)(12 Aug 2019 09:38): [took: 4.731s] result: OK > 9.3.0 (4212a6a3e44f8704)(12 Mar 2020 11:08): [took: 4.770s] result: OK > 10.1.0 (6e6e3f144a33ae50)(07 May 2020 10:50): [took: 4.924s] result: OK > 10.2.0 (ee5c3db6c5b2c333)(23 Jul 2020 06:35): [took: 4.919s] result: OK As I wrote in comment 3, I can no longer reproduce it either. It appeared = in a 10.2.0 branch build of ~13.08.2020, but has since been resolved.=