From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
Received: by sourceware.org (Postfix, from userid 48)
 id 5C19B3860C3A; Mon, 24 Aug 2020 09:38:08 +0000 (GMT)
DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 sourceware.org 5C19B3860C3A
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gcc.gnu.org;
 s=default; t=1598261888;
 bh=O12aAAscn67Qi019hmkiy35jIGB1ez19A/W7rvCQsTw=;
 h=From:To:Subject:Date:In-Reply-To:References:From;
 b=NRZoa00CqYc9k0SHcTSzk0jn5VRclnR129SHV2Hmce3TMUFUwtQK5IN0SuCT8y8SI
 STzPtuXbRCQDx2P0W43VAXln/0shG3ZOOu56c93aRZjMf6YGgugsvB2a07DPUpx7X0
 /UQjoN57zzKQL3sbyKAGTXj6E/Z/LN84hgut35Ps=
From: "marxin at gcc dot gnu.org" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug middle-end/96750] 10-12% performance decrease in benchmark
 going from GCC8 to GCC9/GCC10
Date: Mon, 24 Aug 2020 09:38:08 +0000
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC
X-Bugzilla-Type: changed
X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None
X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc
X-Bugzilla-Component: middle-end
X-Bugzilla-Version: unknown
X-Bugzilla-Keywords: missed-optimization
X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal
X-Bugzilla-Who: marxin at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Status: NEW
X-Bugzilla-Resolution: 
X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3
X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: ---
X-Bugzilla-Flags: 
X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: 
Message-ID: <bug-96750-4-CkWXrAGZqK@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
In-Reply-To: <bug-96750-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
References: <bug-96750-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-BeenThere: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Gcc-bugs mailing list <gcc-bugs.gcc.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://gcc.gnu.org/mailman/options/gcc-bugs>,
 <mailto:gcc-bugs-request@gcc.gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://gcc.gnu.org/pipermail/gcc-bugs/>
List-Post: <mailto:gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gcc-bugs-request@gcc.gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://gcc.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/gcc-bugs>,
 <mailto:gcc-bugs-request@gcc.gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 24 Aug 2020 09:38:08 -0000

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D96750

--- Comment #3 from Martin Li=C5=A1ka <marxin at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
(In reply to Marc Glisse from comment #2)
> (In reply to Martin Li=C5=A1ka from comment #1)
> > after:
> > 1794240.0
> >=20
> > before:
> > 1802710.0
>=20
> That's less than 1% of difference (with "after" better than "before"), not
> the 10% regression claimed, maybe there is another relevant commit?

Sorry, I copied bad numbers:

after:
1806140.0

before:
1705630.0

which is ~6% regression.=