From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: by sourceware.org (Postfix, from userid 48) id 5FAD8385841D; Mon, 22 Nov 2021 09:35:55 +0000 (GMT) DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 sourceware.org 5FAD8385841D From: "redi at gcc dot gnu.org" To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org Subject: [Bug c++/96868] C++20 designated initializer erroneous warnings Date: Mon, 22 Nov 2021 09:35:55 +0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC X-Bugzilla-Type: changed X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc X-Bugzilla-Component: c++ X-Bugzilla-Version: 10.2.0 X-Bugzilla-Keywords: diagnostic X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal X-Bugzilla-Who: redi at gcc dot gnu.org X-Bugzilla-Status: UNCONFIRMED X-Bugzilla-Resolution: X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3 X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: --- X-Bugzilla-Flags: X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated MIME-Version: 1.0 X-BeenThere: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Gcc-bugs mailing list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 22 Nov 2021 09:35:55 -0000 https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D96868 --- Comment #3 from Jonathan Wakely --- (In reply to Matt Godbolt from comment #2) > Thanks: I was confused (as I think will many folks be). Approximately everybody is confused by -Wmissing-field-initializers which is why people probably shouldn't use it. It specifically says the **initializer** is missing, not that initializatio= n is missing. But everybody thinks it's telling them the member is uninitialized. The manual is at least clear: > the following code causes such a warning, because "x.h" is implicitly zero Unfortunately it also says: > This option does not warn about designated initializers which might be true for C, but not C++. Should it be true for C++?=