From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
Received: by sourceware.org (Postfix, from userid 48)
 id 0B7C23858C3A; Thu, 10 Feb 2022 21:15:33 +0000 (GMT)
DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 sourceware.org 0B7C23858C3A
From: "dzhioev at gmail dot com" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug c++/96868] C++20 designated initializer erroneous warnings
Date: Thu, 10 Feb 2022 21:15:32 +0000
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC
X-Bugzilla-Type: changed
X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None
X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc
X-Bugzilla-Component: c++
X-Bugzilla-Version: 10.2.0
X-Bugzilla-Keywords: diagnostic
X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal
X-Bugzilla-Who: dzhioev at gmail dot com
X-Bugzilla-Status: UNCONFIRMED
X-Bugzilla-Resolution: 
X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3
X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: ---
X-Bugzilla-Flags: 
X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: cc
Message-ID: <bug-96868-4-S4zYqKR8Pg@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
In-Reply-To: <bug-96868-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
References: <bug-96868-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-BeenThere: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Gcc-bugs mailing list <gcc-bugs.gcc.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://gcc.gnu.org/mailman/options/gcc-bugs>,
 <mailto:gcc-bugs-request@gcc.gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://gcc.gnu.org/pipermail/gcc-bugs/>
List-Post: <mailto:gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gcc-bugs-request@gcc.gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://gcc.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/gcc-bugs>,
 <mailto:gcc-bugs-request@gcc.gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 10 Feb 2022 21:15:33 -0000

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D96868

Pavel Sergeev <dzhioev at gmail dot com> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
                 CC|                            |dzhioev at gmail dot com

--- Comment #4 from Pavel Sergeev <dzhioev at gmail dot com> ---
(In reply to Jonathan Wakely from comment #3)
> (In reply to Matt Godbolt from comment #2)
> > Thanks: I was confused (as I think will many folks be).
>=20
> Approximately everybody is confused by -Wmissing-field-initializers which=
 is
> why people probably shouldn't use it.
>=20
> It specifically says the **initializer** is missing, not that initializat=
ion
> is missing. But everybody thinks it's telling them the member is
> uninitialized.
>=20
> The manual is at least clear:
>=20
> > the following code causes such a warning, because "x.h" is implicitly z=
ero
>=20
> Unfortunately it also says:
>=20
> > This option does not warn about designated initializers
>=20
> which might be true for C, but not C++. Should it be true for C++?

Do you see any reasons why it shouldn't?=