From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
Received: by sourceware.org (Postfix, from userid 48)
	id AFCDA3856609; Fri,  9 Jun 2023 14:23:05 +0000 (GMT)
DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 sourceware.org AFCDA3856609
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gcc.gnu.org;
	s=default; t=1686320585;
	bh=TUQrgYzlWC5PSpGgAuaRs+Atoj+tliB19fqhVM2JsTY=;
	h=From:To:Subject:Date:In-Reply-To:References:From;
	b=BjblZ6zwKXou0CvmdoBZpQS1JoozLWTbaFbJAiNDItxUZ58ptOMN+9t/nSo/EPR6/
	 vB1Jmm3M5eIZ4Axfhg/PdqsjCoc6In7m9eDEJ+ILA2orGCoq+Hhn/a7sHnDcV64eVj
	 uxKSgLL28B4H9YEjqsEhgl8r9LEpBttRrZ1zVMgA=
From: "cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug c++/96868] C++20 designated initializer erroneous warnings
Date: Fri, 09 Jun 2023 14:23:04 +0000
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC
X-Bugzilla-Type: changed
X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None
X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc
X-Bugzilla-Component: c++
X-Bugzilla-Version: 10.2.0
X-Bugzilla-Keywords: diagnostic
X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal
X-Bugzilla-Who: cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Status: UNCONFIRMED
X-Bugzilla-Resolution: 
X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3
X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: ---
X-Bugzilla-Flags: 
X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: 
Message-ID: <bug-96868-4-lycBv2yi7n@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
In-Reply-To: <bug-96868-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
References: <bug-96868-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
MIME-Version: 1.0
List-Id: <gcc-bugs.sourceware.org>

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D96868

--- Comment #8 from CVS Commits <cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
The trunk branch has been updated by Marek Polacek <mpolacek@gcc.gnu.org>:

https://gcc.gnu.org/g:0f8f1dee851c23bce19977b2531cf69b4da9f88f

commit r14-1657-g0f8f1dee851c23bce19977b2531cf69b4da9f88f
Author: Marek Polacek <polacek@redhat.com>
Date:   Thu Jun 8 13:52:11 2023 -0400

    doc: Clarification for -Wmissing-field-initializers

    The manual is incorrect in saying that the option does not warn
    about designated initializers, which it does in C++.  Whether the
    divergence in behavior is desirable is another thing, but let's
    at least make the manual match the reality.

            PR c/39589
            PR c++/96868

    gcc/ChangeLog:

            * doc/invoke.texi: Clarify that -Wmissing-field-initializers
doesn't
            warn about designated initializers in C only.=