public inbox for gcc-bugs@sourceware.org help / color / mirror / Atom feed
* [Bug c++/96871] New: Fails to parse templated constructor in template class
@ 2020-08-31 16:13 tiagomacarios at gmail dot com
2020-08-31 21:47 ` [Bug c++/96871] [11 Regression] " mpolacek at gcc dot gnu.org
2020-09-01 0:35 ` mpolacek at gcc dot gnu.org
0 siblings, 2 replies; 3+ messages in thread
From: tiagomacarios at gmail dot com @ 2020-08-31 16:13 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96871
Bug ID: 96871
Summary: Fails to parse templated constructor in template class
Product: gcc
Version: 11.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: c++
Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
Reporter: tiagomacarios at gmail dot com
Target Milestone: ---
Both clang and MSVC compile the below fine - gcc fails.
https://godbolt.org/z/hfPdKT
#include <utility>
template <typename T>
struct S {
template <typename... Arg>
S<T>(Arg&&... arg);
};
<source>:6:11: error: expected ')' before '&&' token
6 | S<T>(Arg&&... arg);
| ~ ^~
| )
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread* [Bug c++/96871] [11 Regression] Fails to parse templated constructor in template class 2020-08-31 16:13 [Bug c++/96871] New: Fails to parse templated constructor in template class tiagomacarios at gmail dot com @ 2020-08-31 21:47 ` mpolacek at gcc dot gnu.org 2020-09-01 0:35 ` mpolacek at gcc dot gnu.org 1 sibling, 0 replies; 3+ messages in thread From: mpolacek at gcc dot gnu.org @ 2020-08-31 21:47 UTC (permalink / raw) To: gcc-bugs https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96871 Marek Polacek <mpolacek at gcc dot gnu.org> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Summary|Fails to parse templated |[11 Regression] Fails to |constructor in template |parse templated constructor |class |in template class CC| |mpolacek at gcc dot gnu.org Target Milestone|--- |11.0 Last reconfirmed| |2020-08-31 Keywords| |needs-bisection, | |rejects-valid Ever confirmed|0 |1 Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW --- Comment #1 from Marek Polacek <mpolacek at gcc dot gnu.org> --- Looks like an 11 regression with -std=c++20. Can't bisect right now, maybe tomorrow. ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
* [Bug c++/96871] [11 Regression] Fails to parse templated constructor in template class 2020-08-31 16:13 [Bug c++/96871] New: Fails to parse templated constructor in template class tiagomacarios at gmail dot com 2020-08-31 21:47 ` [Bug c++/96871] [11 Regression] " mpolacek at gcc dot gnu.org @ 2020-09-01 0:35 ` mpolacek at gcc dot gnu.org 1 sibling, 0 replies; 3+ messages in thread From: mpolacek at gcc dot gnu.org @ 2020-09-01 0:35 UTC (permalink / raw) To: gcc-bugs https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96871 Marek Polacek <mpolacek at gcc dot gnu.org> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution|--- |INVALID Keywords|needs-bisection, | |rejects-valid | --- Comment #2 from Marek Polacek <mpolacek at gcc dot gnu.org> --- Oh duh, this is actually DR 2237 that I implemented. It says "A simple-template-id is no longer valid as the declarator-id of a constructor or destructor." So instead of S<T>(Arg&&... arg); write S(Arg&&... arg); This is mentioned here too: https://gcc.gnu.org/gcc-11/changes.html ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2020-09-01 0:35 UTC | newest] Thread overview: 3+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed) -- links below jump to the message on this page -- 2020-08-31 16:13 [Bug c++/96871] New: Fails to parse templated constructor in template class tiagomacarios at gmail dot com 2020-08-31 21:47 ` [Bug c++/96871] [11 Regression] " mpolacek at gcc dot gnu.org 2020-09-01 0:35 ` mpolacek at gcc dot gnu.org
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox; as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).