public inbox for gcc-bugs@sourceware.org help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "dmalcolm at gcc dot gnu.org" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org> To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org Subject: [Bug analyzer/96894] State explosion on gdb's fibheap.c Date: Wed, 03 Mar 2021 18:37:43 +0000 [thread overview] Message-ID: <bug-96894-4-jX276tvpM8@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/> (raw) In-Reply-To: <bug-96894-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96894 David Malcolm <dmalcolm at gcc dot gnu.org> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Summary|Analyzer assumes pointer is |State explosion on gdb's |NULL, even if pointer was |fibheap.c |tested to be non-null | |before | --- Comment #3 from David Malcolm <dmalcolm at gcc dot gnu.org> --- I'm not seeing the false positive any more with trunk. Enabling -Wanalyzer-too-complex shows that the analyzer is still safety limits and stopping (both per-program-point limits and the overall node limit). If I bump up the limits, it fully explores the egraph, without showing any diagnostics: ./xgcc -B. -S -fanalyzer ../../src/pr96894.c \ -Wanalyzer-too-complex \ --param analyzer-max-enodes-per-program-point=200 \ --param analyzer-bb-explosion-factor=50 So it appears that the false positive from -Wanalyzer-null-dereference is fixed, but there's some kind of state explosion bug going on; we ought to be able to explore this file without hitting the safety limits. Retitling this bug accordingly
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2021-03-03 18:37 UTC|newest] Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top 2020-09-02 7:44 [Bug analyzer/96894] New: Analyzer assumes pointer is NULL, even if pointer was tested to be non-null before vries at gcc dot gnu.org 2020-09-02 19:14 ` [Bug analyzer/96894] " dmalcolm at gcc dot gnu.org 2021-02-14 17:25 ` dimhen at gmail dot com 2021-03-03 18:37 ` dmalcolm at gcc dot gnu.org [this message] 2021-03-12 21:52 ` [Bug analyzer/96894] State explosion on gdb's fibheap.c dmalcolm at gcc dot gnu.org
Reply instructions: You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email using any one of the following methods: * Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client, and reply-to-all from there: mbox Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style * Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to switches of git-send-email(1): git send-email \ --in-reply-to=bug-96894-4-jX276tvpM8@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/ \ --to=gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org \ --cc=gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org \ /path/to/YOUR_REPLY https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html * If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header via mailto: links, try the mailto: linkBe sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox; as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).