From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: by sourceware.org (Postfix, from userid 48) id EBE14384C004; Wed, 2 Sep 2020 08:29:44 +0000 (GMT) DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 sourceware.org EBE14384C004 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gcc.gnu.org; s=default; t=1599035384; bh=Ye9q8P5Jwxzmo1cx9vwkY9fzgiiVyLOipAPOs4iScPo=; h=From:To:Subject:Date:In-Reply-To:References:From; b=wNcjD1jvVgvu4YMcrApPWLTIwI5rXWqhSv6p0oyrqKKuJENhJWKa1Vv4y4IjLWb2F +r+AoEOg9p23NEF/ra8b+wriyCNYNQatqID2DG4/2VqhMnOKGmPPm9jflAEMnc7Ov9 f9mfNl2H0sMMWM5ag8IzT7Y0t0qXE9QpoEumXxQY= From: "rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org" To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org Subject: [Bug target/96895] ABI of returning V1DF differs between GCC and clang Date: Wed, 02 Sep 2020 08:29:44 +0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC X-Bugzilla-Type: changed X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc X-Bugzilla-Component: target X-Bugzilla-Version: 11.0 X-Bugzilla-Keywords: ABI X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal X-Bugzilla-Who: rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org X-Bugzilla-Status: UNCONFIRMED X-Bugzilla-Resolution: X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3 X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: --- X-Bugzilla-Flags: X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: cf_gcctarget keywords cc Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated MIME-Version: 1.0 X-BeenThere: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Gcc-bugs mailing list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 02 Sep 2020 08:29:45 -0000 https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D96895 Richard Biener changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Target| |x86_64-*-* Keywords| |ABI CC| |hjl at gcc dot gnu.org, | |matz at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment #1 from Richard Biener --- I guess the psABI does not say anything about "non-standard" vector types.= =20 Note v1sf seems to be returned in %xmm0 with GCC but %eax with clang which passes v1sf in general regs as well while GCC passes in %xmm0. typedef float v1df __attribute__((vector_size(4))); v1df foo (v1df x) { return x; }=