From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
Received: by sourceware.org (Postfix, from userid 48)
 id 08B4638930D3; Fri, 12 Feb 2021 05:00:18 +0000 (GMT)
DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 sourceware.org 08B4638930D3
From: "jason at gcc dot gnu.org" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug c++/96926] [9/10/11 Regression] Tuple element w/ member
 reference to incomplete template type rejected
Date: Fri, 12 Feb 2021 05:00:18 +0000
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC
X-Bugzilla-Type: changed
X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None
X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc
X-Bugzilla-Component: c++
X-Bugzilla-Version: 10.2.0
X-Bugzilla-Keywords: rejects-valid
X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal
X-Bugzilla-Who: jason at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Status: ASSIGNED
X-Bugzilla-Resolution: 
X-Bugzilla-Priority: P2
X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: jason at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: 9.4
X-Bugzilla-Flags: 
X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: 
Message-ID: <bug-96926-4-7x8gylzZmW@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
In-Reply-To: <bug-96926-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
References: <bug-96926-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-BeenThere: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Gcc-bugs mailing list <gcc-bugs.gcc.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://gcc.gnu.org/mailman/options/gcc-bugs>,
 <mailto:gcc-bugs-request@gcc.gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://gcc.gnu.org/pipermail/gcc-bugs/>
List-Post: <mailto:gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gcc-bugs-request@gcc.gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://gcc.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/gcc-bugs>,
 <mailto:gcc-bugs-request@gcc.gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 12 Feb 2021 05:00:19 -0000

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D96926

--- Comment #4 from Jason Merrill <jason at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
Further reduced:

template <typename T> struct A {
  using type =3D typename T::type;
};
template <typename U> class B {
  template <typename V =3D int,
            typename A<V>::type X>
  B(U);
};
struct C {
  B<int> b;
  C();
};
int main() {
  C c;
}

We run into trouble trying to implicitly declare the copy constructor for C,
which involves overload resolution to find the constructor called for copyi=
ng
B<int>.

After r262172, when we consider the constructor template, we try to substit=
ute
the default template argument for V into the type of X, which involves
instantiating A<int>, which fails.  Before r262172, we would see that we ca=
n't
convert B<int> to int, and give up on the candidate before getting to this
substitution.  But r262172 moves the convertibility checking until after we=
're
done with deduction, as per http://wg21.link/cwg2369

I think perhaps it's wrong to do substitution at this point because X has no
default argument.  Giving it a default argument causes clang 10 to also rej=
ect
the testcase.=