From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: by sourceware.org (Postfix, from userid 48) id 3E5F03985423; Thu, 10 Sep 2020 22:11:32 +0000 (GMT) DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 sourceware.org 3E5F03985423 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gcc.gnu.org; s=default; t=1599775892; bh=cog32N7dMTiN0tTIe23jCvX4EtQ3GPYXPBEjijqV5fo=; h=From:To:Subject:Date:In-Reply-To:References:From; b=O1mYVT6/xot6ooXv6dr4yiZ9pJ2dbB1RHDXO6h+pEFUvOD5lR8WIaV8b9vLiqO53x br/VZFvk2hmsV394+qKKa+32qCLLLO8JbUumF2VwiewZUZUZowiAn+oIGQHGfbcY7Z YwQJzYyrpilDnx5FeCkVk0gJ1+DmI+qTs4Lg1+9g= From: "ro at CeBiTec dot Uni-Bielefeld.DE" To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org Subject: [Bug fortran/96983] [11 regression] ICE compiling gfortran.dg/pr96711.f90 starting with r11-3042 Date: Thu, 10 Sep 2020 22:11:32 +0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC X-Bugzilla-Type: changed X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc X-Bugzilla-Component: fortran X-Bugzilla-Version: 11.0 X-Bugzilla-Keywords: X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal X-Bugzilla-Who: ro at CeBiTec dot Uni-Bielefeld.DE X-Bugzilla-Status: UNCONFIRMED X-Bugzilla-Resolution: X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3 X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: 11.0 X-Bugzilla-Flags: X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated MIME-Version: 1.0 X-BeenThere: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Gcc-bugs mailing list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 10 Sep 2020 22:11:32 -0000 https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D96983 --- Comment #14 from ro at CeBiTec dot Uni-Bielefeld.DE --- > --- Comment #13 from anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org --- > This may lead to a total mess, and I am unable to test it, but can you tr= y: I just ran bootstraps on both sparc-sun-solaris2.11 and i386-pc-solaris2.11. x86 results are unchanged, but sparc is completely miserable: =3D=3D=3D gfortran Summary for unix =3D=3D=3D # of expected passes 18878 # of unexpected failures 16537 # of expected failures 177 # of untested testcases 1752 # of unresolved testcases 14688 # of unsupported tests 706 likewise with -m64. Most (all?) tests fail to link now, failing to find one or more of cabsq copysignq fmodq roundq sqrtq truncq e.g. FAIL: gfortran.dg/coarray/alloc_comp_1.f90 -fcoarray=3Dsingle -O2 (test = for excess errors) Excess errors: Undefined first referenced symbol in file cabsq=20=20=20=20=20=20=20=20=20=20=20=20=20=20=20=20=20=20=20=20=20=20=20= =20=20=20=20=20=20=20 /var/gcc/regression/master/11.4-gcc-gas/build/sparc-sun-solaris2.11/./libgf= ortran/.libs/libgfortran.so fmodq=20=20=20=20=20=20=20=20=20=20=20=20=20=20=20=20=20=20=20=20=20=20=20= =20=20=20=20=20=20=20 /var/gcc/regression/master/11.4-gcc-gas/build/sparc-sun-solaris2.11/./libgf= ortran/.libs/libgfortran.so sqrtq=20=20=20=20=20=20=20=20=20=20=20=20=20=20=20=20=20=20=20=20=20=20=20= =20=20=20=20=20=20=20 /var/gcc/regression/master/11.4-gcc-gas/build/sparc-sun-solaris2.11/./libgf= ortran/.libs/libgfortran.so roundq=20=20=20=20=20=20=20=20=20=20=20=20=20=20=20=20=20=20=20=20=20=20=20= =20=20=20=20=20=20 /var/gcc/regression/master/11.4-gcc-gas/build/sparc-sun-solaris2.11/./libgf= ortran/.libs/libgfortran.so truncq=20=20=20=20=20=20=20=20=20=20=20=20=20=20=20=20=20=20=20=20=20=20=20= =20=20=20=20=20=20 /var/gcc/regression/master/11.4-gcc-gas/build/sparc-sun-solaris2.11/./libgf= ortran/.libs/libgfortran.so copysignq=20=20=20=20=20=20=20=20=20=20=20=20=20=20=20=20=20=20=20=20=20=20= =20=20=20=20 /var/gcc/regression/master/11.4-gcc-gas/build/sparc-sun-solaris2.11/./libgf= ortran/.libs/libgfortran.so ld: fatal: symbol referencing errors=