From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: by sourceware.org (Postfix, from userid 48) id 4C0B2385702B; Tue, 8 Sep 2020 20:52:08 +0000 (GMT) DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 sourceware.org 4C0B2385702B DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gcc.gnu.org; s=default; t=1599598328; bh=laQGkn0J+/0TDQI+OWS28UA4y0vhwWizLOFtKYWqRCI=; h=From:To:Subject:Date:In-Reply-To:References:From; b=mgk30fbMza0DHyKnYeSZJaFpE5fERDuUEJ5s7sFWkFRSPcuB/62Qpqja5gz4I80Aa wzFK+IsMIP/zilAZ4XtOzo1KILaxnZ7AVti533LQ7zE9W+DF8UVm0YCeo7ILYT1fjt NKo2NKaJMNrAExFNPXVz1YKYqlcXiXvxmDT4/7NE= From: "bergner at gcc dot gnu.org" To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org Subject: [Bug fortran/96983] [11 regression] ICE compiling gfortran.dg/pr96711.f90 starting with r11-3042 Date: Tue, 08 Sep 2020 20:52:08 +0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC X-Bugzilla-Type: changed X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc X-Bugzilla-Component: fortran X-Bugzilla-Version: 11.0 X-Bugzilla-Keywords: X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal X-Bugzilla-Who: bergner at gcc dot gnu.org X-Bugzilla-Status: UNCONFIRMED X-Bugzilla-Resolution: X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3 X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: 11.0 X-Bugzilla-Flags: X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated MIME-Version: 1.0 X-BeenThere: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Gcc-bugs mailing list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 08 Sep 2020 20:52:08 -0000 https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D96983 --- Comment #5 from Peter Bergner --- (In reply to seurer from comment #3) > That said, should the dg-require-effective-target fortran_real_16 "work" = on > powerpc64? REAL*16 is a 16 byte double, correct? Ie, our long double? Therefore, it should exist and work too.=