From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
Received: by sourceware.org (Postfix, from userid 48)
 id 610B1386EC62; Wed,  9 Sep 2020 14:54:42 +0000 (GMT)
DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 sourceware.org 610B1386EC62
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gcc.gnu.org;
 s=default; t=1599663282;
 bh=7FA9Z4tGfPWDqF5qkHAduG5N/gtqJUa+LPrsdHkDfL0=;
 h=From:To:Subject:Date:In-Reply-To:References:From;
 b=unaUpA559gwDXURq/jL/s0pypCv7EWoB1ANkQ2dHUJ27jvlfRyZUSW7IGqx0dWAen
 crnQGiBGGgZ8P68XzZi9Ci+LBipzHQOpF/uQIzRNLbSRJwXYK7/KWqEXH/JdNx1Yo9
 925j2zdi8cPPYIOvQQow4GaZ9t+N0mD+PDGBffo4=
From: "anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug fortran/96983] [11 regression] ICE compiling
 gfortran.dg/pr96711.f90 starting with r11-3042
Date: Wed, 09 Sep 2020 14:54:42 +0000
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC
X-Bugzilla-Type: changed
X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None
X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc
X-Bugzilla-Component: fortran
X-Bugzilla-Version: 11.0
X-Bugzilla-Keywords: 
X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal
X-Bugzilla-Who: anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Status: UNCONFIRMED
X-Bugzilla-Resolution: 
X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3
X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: 11.0
X-Bugzilla-Flags: 
X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: 
Message-ID: <bug-96983-4-oiCCSgJMkS@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
In-Reply-To: <bug-96983-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
References: <bug-96983-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-BeenThere: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Gcc-bugs mailing list <gcc-bugs.gcc.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://gcc.gnu.org/mailman/options/gcc-bugs>,
 <mailto:gcc-bugs-request@gcc.gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://gcc.gnu.org/pipermail/gcc-bugs/>
List-Post: <mailto:gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gcc-bugs-request@gcc.gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://gcc.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/gcc-bugs>,
 <mailto:gcc-bugs-request@gcc.gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 09 Sep 2020 14:54:42 -0000

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D96983

--- Comment #8 from anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org ---
(In reply to Rainer Orth from comment #6)
> The test also FAIL on 64-bit SPARC with an ICE/SEGV:
>=20
> 0x67606b build_round_expr
>         /vol/gcc/src/hg/master/local/gcc/fortran/trans-intrinsic.c:408

That's:

      arg =3D fold_convert (gfc_float128_type_node, arg);

Can you find out what gfc_float128_type_node is on SPARC,
and why the conversion fails?

There's apparently a real kind with mode_precision >=3D 128,
so we have to find out what it is, and if we can convert to it.=