From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
Received: by sourceware.org (Postfix, from userid 48)
 id D59E23850417; Tue,  8 Sep 2020 19:54:24 +0000 (GMT)
DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 sourceware.org D59E23850417
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gcc.gnu.org;
 s=default; t=1599594864;
 bh=nXJ6RsMJ56WeXim0rdntn4wPH8364+yy96EtfUlQ4tU=;
 h=From:To:Subject:Date:In-Reply-To:References:From;
 b=Zn0xq5ULmPkkwgAoY99MQse3SMpVScimQxH26pGFFGDZVPi+CoX8mkcYEFei4nGhA
 mjsoj7DbQC7w/7ODVltbRJNhM+WuxkOkafCWSloi/N7Q1LCAxQPfywhCMptsuB/MQ8
 hTup8jz2QBFkpCXenQgz3x38xbntQ7Oldgv6q4lY=
From: "seurer at gcc dot gnu.org" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug fortran/96983] [11 regression] ICE compiling
 gfortran.dg/pr96711.f90 starting with r11-3042
Date: Tue, 08 Sep 2020 19:54:24 +0000
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC
X-Bugzilla-Type: changed
X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None
X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc
X-Bugzilla-Component: fortran
X-Bugzilla-Version: 11.0
X-Bugzilla-Keywords: 
X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal
X-Bugzilla-Who: seurer at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Status: UNCONFIRMED
X-Bugzilla-Resolution: 
X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3
X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: 11.0
X-Bugzilla-Flags: 
X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: 
Message-ID: <bug-96983-4-tUvJgGUfu7@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
In-Reply-To: <bug-96983-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
References: <bug-96983-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-BeenThere: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Gcc-bugs mailing list <gcc-bugs.gcc.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://gcc.gnu.org/mailman/options/gcc-bugs>,
 <mailto:gcc-bugs-request@gcc.gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://gcc.gnu.org/pipermail/gcc-bugs/>
List-Post: <mailto:gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gcc-bugs-request@gcc.gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://gcc.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/gcc-bugs>,
 <mailto:gcc-bugs-request@gcc.gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 08 Sep 2020 19:54:24 -0000

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D96983

--- Comment #4 from seurer at gcc dot gnu.org ---
I see 6 other tests that use that:

gcc/testsuite/gfortran.dg/io_real_boz_3.f90:3:! { dg-require-effective-targ=
et
fortran_real_16 }
gcc/testsuite/gfortran.dg/io_real_boz_4.f90:3:! { dg-require-effective-targ=
et
fortran_real_16 }
gcc/testsuite/gfortran.dg/io_real_boz_5.f90:3:! { dg-require-effective-targ=
et
fortran_real_16 }
gcc/testsuite/gfortran.dg/nan_7.f90:3:! { dg-require-effective-target
fortran_real_16 }
gcc/testsuite/gfortran.dg/pr82253.f90:2:! { dg-do compile { target
fortran_real_16 } }
gcc/testsuite/gfortran.dg/pr96711.f90:3:! { dg-require-effective-target
fortran_real_16 }
gcc/testsuite/gfortran.dg/promotion_3.f90:3:! { dg-require-effective-target
fortran_real_16 }


Only nan_7.f90 is specifically skipped on powerpc and that is for another
reason as I recall.=