From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
Received: by sourceware.org (Postfix, from userid 48)
 id E8D7E3858D29; Sat,  2 Jan 2021 01:32:24 +0000 (GMT)
DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 sourceware.org E8D7E3858D29
From: "kargl at gcc dot gnu.org" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug fortran/96986] [8/9/10/11 Regression] Explicit interface
 required: volatile argument for ENTRY subroutine
Date: Sat, 02 Jan 2021 01:32:24 +0000
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC
X-Bugzilla-Type: changed
X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None
X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc
X-Bugzilla-Component: fortran
X-Bugzilla-Version: 8.3.1
X-Bugzilla-Keywords: diagnostic
X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal
X-Bugzilla-Who: kargl at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Status: NEW
X-Bugzilla-Resolution: 
X-Bugzilla-Priority: P4
X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: 8.5
X-Bugzilla-Flags: 
X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: cc priority bug_status
Message-ID: <bug-96986-4-2nhzI2hG2a@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
In-Reply-To: <bug-96986-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
References: <bug-96986-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-BeenThere: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Gcc-bugs mailing list <gcc-bugs.gcc.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://gcc.gnu.org/mailman/options/gcc-bugs>,
 <mailto:gcc-bugs-request@gcc.gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://gcc.gnu.org/pipermail/gcc-bugs/>
List-Post: <mailto:gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gcc-bugs-request@gcc.gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://gcc.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/gcc-bugs>,
 <mailto:gcc-bugs-request@gcc.gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 02 Jan 2021 01:32:25 -0000

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D96986

kargl at gcc dot gnu.org changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
                 CC|                            |kargl at gcc dot gnu.org
           Priority|P5                          |P4
             Status|WAITING                     |NEW

--- Comment #5 from kargl at gcc dot gnu.org ---
The code is valid.  Gfortran error message is bogus.  The pertinent
part of the Fortran standard is the last sentence here:

   If the ENTRY statement is in a subroutine subprogram, an additional
   subroutine is defined by that subprogram.  The name of the subroutine
   is entry-name. The dummy arguments of the subroutine are those
   specified in the ENTRY statement

The entry statement 'entry func_a()' in question has no dummy arguments.

The portion of the Fortran standard quoted in comment #2 clearly
does not apply.

Also note that the requirement of an explicit interface comes if a
programmer wants to call 'entry func_b(va)'.   Thus, the following
code is also conforming.

subroutine bar(va)
   integer, volatile :: va
   va =3D 42
end subroutine bar

program foo
   integer n
   interface
      subroutine bar(va)
         integer, volatile :: va
      end subroutine bar
   end interface
   call bar(n)
   print *, n
end program foo=