From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
Received: by sourceware.org (Postfix, from userid 48)
 id AFEF1385783A; Tue,  8 Sep 2020 19:22:46 +0000 (GMT)
DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 sourceware.org AFEF1385783A
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gcc.gnu.org;
 s=default; t=1599592966;
 bh=gJ8mKTwo7qEtQhobODgmRsy9B47mWmEtdl0ZBTKGAAE=;
 h=From:To:Subject:Date:From;
 b=lVNNZpz2nlX0I6DPuB9eGpHC0Qqu60xVPzxrLbUhGpbHFEq/1pF76vrAllfUxJy/3
 haI34DpMCk19NbTsv2yWGvMajabGEhyYeXFxNTf3tQE07ikq1RRrFwLkHLjs1jOkFM
 RAz0HOjMmWTkXlTRWM4GqHQqR8FesueVdMALn0Es=
From: "foreese at gcc dot gnu.org" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug fortran/96986] New: [8 Regression] Explicit interface required:
 volatile argument for ENTRY subroutine
Date: Tue, 08 Sep 2020 19:22:46 +0000
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC
X-Bugzilla-Type: new
X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None
X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc
X-Bugzilla-Component: fortran
X-Bugzilla-Version: 8.3.1
X-Bugzilla-Keywords: 
X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal
X-Bugzilla-Who: foreese at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Status: UNCONFIRMED
X-Bugzilla-Resolution: 
X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3
X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: ---
X-Bugzilla-Flags: 
X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: bug_id short_desc product version bug_status
 bug_severity priority component assigned_to reporter target_milestone
 attachments.created
Message-ID: <bug-96986-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-BeenThere: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Gcc-bugs mailing list <gcc-bugs.gcc.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://gcc.gnu.org/mailman/options/gcc-bugs>,
 <mailto:gcc-bugs-request@gcc.gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://gcc.gnu.org/pipermail/gcc-bugs/>
List-Post: <mailto:gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gcc-bugs-request@gcc.gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://gcc.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/gcc-bugs>,
 <mailto:gcc-bugs-request@gcc.gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 08 Sep 2020 19:22:46 -0000

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D96986

            Bug ID: 96986
           Summary: [8 Regression] Explicit interface required: volatile
                    argument for ENTRY subroutine
           Product: gcc
           Version: 8.3.1
            Status: UNCONFIRMED
          Severity: normal
          Priority: P3
         Component: fortran
          Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
          Reporter: foreese at gcc dot gnu.org
  Target Milestone: ---

Created attachment 49200
  --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=3D49200&action=3Dedit
Testcase which exhibits the regression

GCC 8.3.1 does not accept the following program, but all versions 4.x throu=
gh
7.x and <=3D 8.3.0 do:

$ cat volatile.for
      subroutine volatile_test ()
        implicit none
        integer(4), volatile :: va

        entry fun_a()
        return

        entry fun_b(va)
          call fun_c()
        return
      end

      subroutine fun_c ()
        implicit none
        call fun_a()
        return
      end
$ gfortran -std=3Dlegacy -c volatile.for
volatile.for:15:18:

         call fun_a()
                  1
Error: Explicit interface required for =E2=80=98fun_a=E2=80=99 at (1): vola=
tile argument


It seems that because fun_b() has a volatile argument, the subroutine
volatile_test() is marked as such. Subsequently the call to fun_a() from
fun_c() within the same procedure trips the error.

The regression appears to have been introduced in r269895 on gcc-9 which fi=
xed
PR 78865. The fix was backported to gcc-8 by r270032 and released as part of
8.3.1.=