From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
Received: by sourceware.org (Postfix, from userid 48)
 id 8A2863857C74; Wed,  9 Sep 2020 10:20:38 +0000 (GMT)
DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 sourceware.org 8A2863857C74
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gcc.gnu.org;
 s=default; t=1599646838;
 bh=AW0k+SbBO1TcDL/Rz8j0G2xZPgouujSKr8qvLt/gQV0=;
 h=From:To:Subject:Date:In-Reply-To:References:From;
 b=Pp1b4zOOPcODovZ0zntUaDMpl6z0EnlgP9jRdJV5+w3EgoO4TAzLcPnFEAW5UMISp
 2CeKyBH1qmjieZJpBfyWJhPD63ZQEij4QAWVsKWtj0z2WVkxntlCn0aIPELUkkWwqz
 I+iVk7utgfx9IGnpGxYmGpO/nO3qCYjGYNbgbIiA=
From: "jakub at gcc dot gnu.org" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug rtl-optimization/96993] [10/11 Regression] invalid code
Date: Wed, 09 Sep 2020 10:20:38 +0000
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC
X-Bugzilla-Type: changed
X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None
X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc
X-Bugzilla-Component: rtl-optimization
X-Bugzilla-Version: 10.2.0
X-Bugzilla-Keywords: wrong-code
X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal
X-Bugzilla-Who: jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Status: UNCONFIRMED
X-Bugzilla-Resolution: 
X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3
X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: 10.3
X-Bugzilla-Flags: 
X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: cc
Message-ID: <bug-96993-4-NCZKe4o892@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
In-Reply-To: <bug-96993-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
References: <bug-96993-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-BeenThere: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Gcc-bugs mailing list <gcc-bugs.gcc.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://gcc.gnu.org/mailman/options/gcc-bugs>,
 <mailto:gcc-bugs-request@gcc.gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://gcc.gnu.org/pipermail/gcc-bugs/>
List-Post: <mailto:gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gcc-bugs-request@gcc.gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://gcc.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/gcc-bugs>,
 <mailto:gcc-bugs-request@gcc.gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 09 Sep 2020 10:20:38 -0000

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D96993

Jakub Jelinek <jakub at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
                 CC|                            |jakub at gcc dot gnu.org

--- Comment #2 from Jakub Jelinek <jakub at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
Can you turn it into a self-contained testcase (add noipa attributes to the
external functions and define them some way that it detects the problem, add
noipa attribute to the problematic function and add main that invokes it so
that it can reproduce)?
Without that and knowledge what to look for, it is not really possible e.g.=
 to
bisect it and find out what changed and why.=