From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
Received: by sourceware.org (Postfix, from userid 48)
 id 72D633857824; Thu, 10 Sep 2020 17:55:12 +0000 (GMT)
DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 sourceware.org 72D633857824
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gcc.gnu.org;
 s=default; t=1599760512;
 bh=awd8YFneHe7TQysdGP2HpMKumoXiPGXI9fMUQO1tQRg=;
 h=From:To:Subject:Date:In-Reply-To:References:From;
 b=rsENWEgDT5jQ0SHUfAowXfOfh21q2dnTQKxG+dy60UM2lPJWwvki3qTAP39E+yXLZ
 hkcjB/VdsM4YqVcWKVt/vCYOWYqA27ZnYU6g4MvNqmrWwUiTdcq/8CAOu5TQSC+KDW
 bqBfcVBQRokaFpU/JEMskoMog41gfg6sUdKbQOj8=
From: "jakub at gcc dot gnu.org" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug c++/96994] Missing code from consteval constructor initializing
 const variable
Date: Thu, 10 Sep 2020 17:55:12 +0000
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC
X-Bugzilla-Type: changed
X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None
X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc
X-Bugzilla-Component: c++
X-Bugzilla-Version: unknown
X-Bugzilla-Keywords: wrong-code
X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal
X-Bugzilla-Who: jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Status: NEW
X-Bugzilla-Resolution: 
X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3
X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: ---
X-Bugzilla-Flags: 
X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: 
Message-ID: <bug-96994-4-jhtZFrSyU5@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
In-Reply-To: <bug-96994-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
References: <bug-96994-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-BeenThere: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Gcc-bugs mailing list <gcc-bugs.gcc.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://gcc.gnu.org/mailman/options/gcc-bugs>,
 <mailto:gcc-bugs-request@gcc.gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://gcc.gnu.org/pipermail/gcc-bugs/>
List-Post: <mailto:gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gcc-bugs-request@gcc.gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://gcc.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/gcc-bugs>,
 <mailto:gcc-bugs-request@gcc.gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 10 Sep 2020 17:55:12 -0000

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D96994

--- Comment #3 from Jakub Jelinek <jakub at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
Though:
struct A { consteval A (int x) { i =3D x; } int i =3D 0; };
struct B { constexpr B (int x) { i =3D x; } int i =3D 0; };
A const a =3D 1;
constexpr A b =3D 2;
B const c =3D 3;
A constinit d =3D 4;
static_assert (b.i =3D=3D 2);

int
main()
{
  if (a.i !=3D 1 || c.i !=3D 3 || d.i !=3D 4)
    __builtin_abort ();
}
works fine, so the problem is maybe just with default construction for
consteval ctor.=