From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: by sourceware.org (Postfix, from userid 48) id 5544C3851C36; Thu, 10 Sep 2020 18:11:39 +0000 (GMT) DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 sourceware.org 5544C3851C36 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gcc.gnu.org; s=default; t=1599761499; bh=9Pfsju08d+n5qg0C7CFrtHY6qltpB6lbzOlm+VM3AKw=; h=From:To:Subject:Date:In-Reply-To:References:From; b=VAmhpZrStb3nHLrUpQ8MVr8K5lBsgbOAWwiG88iWY2kBRkmBTM8JFIBuORE6KpGzP 3B58Ou8rlhipk2fBGvtYrRY1lTql2oKlnK9lkQOYPSOCHau/kkzVCSu588KUT6mdvh Y2idFBKuQJEl4oKiZp7wjb3kuff4ZCS05nXJDbPY= From: "jakub at gcc dot gnu.org" To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org Subject: [Bug c++/96994] Missing code from consteval constructor initializing const variable Date: Thu, 10 Sep 2020 18:11:39 +0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC X-Bugzilla-Type: changed X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc X-Bugzilla-Component: c++ X-Bugzilla-Version: unknown X-Bugzilla-Keywords: wrong-code X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal X-Bugzilla-Who: jakub at gcc dot gnu.org X-Bugzilla-Status: NEW X-Bugzilla-Resolution: X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3 X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: --- X-Bugzilla-Flags: X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated MIME-Version: 1.0 X-BeenThere: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Gcc-bugs mailing list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 10 Sep 2020 18:11:39 -0000 https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D96994 --- Comment #6 from Jakub Jelinek --- Though, when the ctor is constexpr, it is constant initialized even without= it, so probably the bug is somewhere else.=