public inbox for gcc-bugs@sourceware.org
help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "clement.chigot at atos dot net" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug libstdc++/97044] New: Undefined format macros because of include order on AIX
Date: Mon, 14 Sep 2020 09:07:03 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <bug-97044-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/> (raw)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97044

            Bug ID: 97044
           Summary: Undefined format macros because of include order on
                    AIX
           Product: gcc
           Version: unknown
            Status: UNCONFIRMED
          Severity: normal
          Priority: P3
         Component: libstdc++
          Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
          Reporter: clement.chigot at atos dot net
  Target Milestone: ---

On AIX, C++ format macros like "PRIu32" might not be defined even if
"cinttypes" is included. It happends when other headers which have a dependency
on "inttypes.h" are included before. 
On AIX, __STDC_FORMAT_MACROS must be defined before "sys/inttypes.h" is
included in order to have these macros defined. But with for example <cstring>,
as "string.h" includes "sys/types" which included "sys/inttypes.h",
__STDC_FORMAT_MACROS won't be defined when "sys/inttypes.h" is first included
thus the format macros won't be defined. 

This program works on Linux but not on AIX. 
#include <cstring>
#include <cinttypes>
#include <iostream>

int main(){
#ifdef PRIu32
  std::cout << "PRIu32 defined" << std::endl;
#else
  std::cout << "PRIu32 not defined" << std::endl;
#endif
}

My question is what are the G++ standards saying on that ? Should <cinttypes>
always defined "PRIu32"-like macros ? Or does the developers should be careful
the order when are included the headers or always add -D__STDC_FORMAT_MACROS ?  

I would clearly go for one. Especially, because knowing that "#include
<cstring>" must be after "#include <cinttypes>" if you want to use "PRIu32" is 
not obvious. 

Clément

             reply	other threads:[~2020-09-14  9:07 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2020-09-14  9:07 clement.chigot at atos dot net [this message]
2020-09-20 20:10 ` [Bug libstdc++/97044] " redi at gcc dot gnu.org
2020-09-20 22:18 ` redi at gcc dot gnu.org
2020-09-21  8:13 ` clement.chigot at atos dot net
2020-09-21 12:48 ` dje at gcc dot gnu.org
2020-09-26 16:01 ` [Bug target/97044] " cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=bug-97044-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/ \
    --to=gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org \
    --cc=gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).