From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
Received: by sourceware.org (Postfix, from userid 48)
	id BF4243858D20; Tue, 31 Oct 2023 07:32:14 +0000 (GMT)
DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 sourceware.org BF4243858D20
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gcc.gnu.org;
	s=default; t=1698737534;
	bh=UnUtfFHYeqP99c40B4IMPI40ysAsZc/Mugarhx6ll60=;
	h=From:To:Subject:Date:In-Reply-To:References:From;
	b=hA/agNASX0As8esO6n1gml6fY8o75an8mCQSy/fXpw40KClYO7Ub49Yga0bApm4Ws
	 7QgexMamXC7LDJ92I1H2vFVu62xVFw6FL8PRG6a1uqTkmwu+L8V+gUTN52Vqn0Xm2a
	 Uq0SiST+/pajGDkp+tLe361+9UgpeI5Z9nZBbn3U=
From: "pault at gcc dot gnu.org" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug fortran/97045] A wrong column is selected when addressing
 individual elements of unlimited polymorphic dummy argument
Date: Tue, 31 Oct 2023 07:32:13 +0000
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC
X-Bugzilla-Type: changed
X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None
X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc
X-Bugzilla-Component: fortran
X-Bugzilla-Version: 10.2.0
X-Bugzilla-Keywords: 
X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal
X-Bugzilla-Who: pault at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Status: RESOLVED
X-Bugzilla-Resolution: FIXED
X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3
X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: pault at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: ---
X-Bugzilla-Flags: 
X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: resolution bug_status
Message-ID: <bug-97045-4-JHR6NGdOKV@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
In-Reply-To: <bug-97045-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
References: <bug-97045-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
MIME-Version: 1.0
List-Id: <gcc-bugs.sourceware.org>

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D97045

Paul Thomas <pault at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
         Resolution|---                         |FIXED
             Status|WAITING                     |RESOLVED

--- Comment #5 from Paul Thomas <pault at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
(In reply to anlauf from comment #4)
> This PR seems to have been fixed 3 years ago.
>=20
> @Paul: can we close it?

That's a grand idea, Harald! Duly closed. I have no idea why it was marked =
as
'waiting'.

Thanks for the report.

Paul=