From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
Received: by sourceware.org (Postfix, from userid 48)
	id 7C6C53857343; Wed, 17 May 2023 10:14:45 +0000 (GMT)
DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 sourceware.org 7C6C53857343
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gcc.gnu.org;
	s=default; t=1684318485;
	bh=clRr6917YaFKkL9LEPaLdLfeWdg1E3ySokN95lnHjsw=;
	h=From:To:Subject:Date:In-Reply-To:References:From;
	b=msJipq5hoIR3zRu343W5AlQ9mq1drA3Zr1oezweVQmwfjsYtzxedqZVMe2+RkuLyH
	 5ibGW5mYJHBKr3roLiRKVBwtvJnjQZOWUUImQhCn8s3CPfj+dFbV9eR4zWXuyVhy2z
	 YQreNxpB9mAOkodDfcaP8CQ15OsZDb6OOLEJY8as=
From: "tonyguil at gmail dot com" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug middle-end/97048] [meta-bug] bogus/missing -Wstringop-overread
 warnings
Date: Wed, 17 May 2023 10:14:44 +0000
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC
X-Bugzilla-Type: changed
X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None
X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc
X-Bugzilla-Component: middle-end
X-Bugzilla-Version: 11.0
X-Bugzilla-Keywords: diagnostic, meta-bug
X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal
X-Bugzilla-Who: tonyguil at gmail dot com
X-Bugzilla-Status: NEW
X-Bugzilla-Resolution: 
X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3
X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: ---
X-Bugzilla-Flags: 
X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: 
Message-ID: <bug-97048-4-oqwm24uI7v@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
In-Reply-To: <bug-97048-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
References: <bug-97048-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
MIME-Version: 1.0
List-Id: <gcc-bugs.sourceware.org>

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D97048

--- Comment #3 from Tony Guilfoyle <tonyguil at gmail dot com> ---
I jumped through enough hoops already, I think. You can take it from=20
here if you want.

All the best,

Tony

On 16/05/2023 18:28, redi at gcc dot gnu.org wrote:
> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D97048
>
> --- Comment #2 from Jonathan Wakely <redi at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
> Tony, this is just a meta-bug that has links to the real bugs. Please eit=
her
> add that as a comment to an existing bug (if it's the same as one of them=
) or
> file a new bug (and set "Blocks: 97048" so that it links back here). But =
since
> your one seems to be about -Wstringop-overflow not -Wstringop-overread I =
don't
> think it is actually related to this meta-bug at all. Maybe it's related =
to PR
> 97185 instead.
>=