From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: by sourceware.org (Postfix, from userid 48) id 771D73851C2E; Fri, 18 Sep 2020 09:01:00 +0000 (GMT) DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 sourceware.org 771D73851C2E DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gcc.gnu.org; s=default; t=1600419660; bh=/Dqug6Pk9r2ZOf1+SSTkg2Jr7Kt+eqZ6Q+x6YEz0ZPo=; h=From:To:Subject:Date:In-Reply-To:References:From; b=rKun7xMwLmuPnA2+neo6PYAO+CFBQ3CTqUVI9pD3bcpN/ctx3o4tfeiC8VVavkJX0 1bnLfKfFoF+dc9HVgVlqQwC604f70OyBxY9K2wYZXtN3VPcwypfBomvXUMWBVfNGOL Q9NcKYGZ96GpLxLGaQ2MZEv2lbVmeCY3YiahD4cU= From: "sirl at gcc dot gnu.org" To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org Subject: [Bug middle-end/97073] [8/9/10/11 Regression] Miscompilation with -m32 -O1 -march=i686 Date: Fri, 18 Sep 2020 09:01:00 +0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC X-Bugzilla-Type: changed X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc X-Bugzilla-Component: middle-end X-Bugzilla-Version: 8.4.1 X-Bugzilla-Keywords: wrong-code X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal X-Bugzilla-Who: sirl at gcc dot gnu.org X-Bugzilla-Status: ASSIGNED X-Bugzilla-Resolution: X-Bugzilla-Priority: P2 X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: jakub at gcc dot gnu.org X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: 8.5 X-Bugzilla-Flags: X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated MIME-Version: 1.0 X-BeenThere: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Gcc-bugs mailing list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 18 Sep 2020 09:01:00 -0000 https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D97073 --- Comment #5 from Franz Sirl --- (In reply to Jakub Jelinek from comment #3) > This broke in between r102000 (still good) and r104000 (already > miscompiled), so I don't believe that 6.3.1 worked. Hmm, maybe something in 6.3.1 is masking the bug? Yesterday I used "gcc ver= sion 6.3.1 20170216 (Red Hat 6.3.1-3) (GCC)" from devtoolset-6-gcc-6.3.1-3.1.el7.x86_64 to try. But in the meantime I built 6.5.0 myself and surely enough it shows the bug too?=