From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: by sourceware.org (Postfix, from userid 48) id 23C40388C02D; Tue, 9 Mar 2021 14:24:02 +0000 (GMT) DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 sourceware.org 23C40388C02D From: "rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org" To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org Subject: [Bug tree-optimization/97104] [11 Regression] aarch64, SVE: ICE in vect_get_loop_mask since r11-3070-g783dc66f9cc Date: Tue, 09 Mar 2021 14:24:02 +0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC X-Bugzilla-Type: changed X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc X-Bugzilla-Component: tree-optimization X-Bugzilla-Version: 11.0 X-Bugzilla-Keywords: ice-on-valid-code, needs-bisection X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal X-Bugzilla-Who: rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org X-Bugzilla-Status: NEW X-Bugzilla-Resolution: X-Bugzilla-Priority: P1 X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: 11.0 X-Bugzilla-Flags: X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: cc keywords Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated MIME-Version: 1.0 X-BeenThere: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Gcc-bugs mailing list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 09 Mar 2021 14:24:02 -0000 https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D97104 Richard Biener changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |marxin at gcc dot gnu.org, | |rsandifo at gcc dot gnu.org Keywords| |needs-bisection --- Comment #4 from Richard Biener --- Also gone latent (or fixed) now. I also know nothing about the loop masks code. Extracting a GIMPLE testcase from one of the broken revs maybe carries this over. We're vectorizing the last testcase with SVE now and not ICEing. So maybe = it was really fixed, who knows (but I don't see any live stmts). Can somebody bisect what fixed this?=