From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
Received: by sourceware.org (Postfix, from userid 48)
	id 99AC83858421; Sat,  3 Feb 2024 01:40:06 +0000 (GMT)
DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 sourceware.org 99AC83858421
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gcc.gnu.org;
	s=default; t=1706924406;
	bh=B9CPV0MV++5FmtpHdcR5hOLvqo2tssJUUxzchs7Tk2o=;
	h=From:To:Subject:Date:In-Reply-To:References:From;
	b=DTAxCJM0MGPcMeKHoskFBU88fJ3NU9E8SAjjEoBEevT0yywbtkisiiYrQq1WmgMXr
	 4QV6u/FktlM1Wd6Ko1M6cBy8JT+EJrctH4CPCDzWH+tkLuqaCCB2WcvwLoqVZZb1JE
	 caYAsHF0zxVjBqlw81TZzpBwkjQmaxGDMLjI+z80=
From: "ali_gccbugzilla at emvision dot com" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug ipa/97119] Top level option to disable creation of IPA symbols
 such as .localalias is desired
Date: Sat, 03 Feb 2024 01:40:03 +0000
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC
X-Bugzilla-Type: changed
X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None
X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc
X-Bugzilla-Component: ipa
X-Bugzilla-Version: 10.2.0
X-Bugzilla-Keywords: 
X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal
X-Bugzilla-Who: ali_gccbugzilla at emvision dot com
X-Bugzilla-Status: NEW
X-Bugzilla-Resolution: 
X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3
X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: ---
X-Bugzilla-Flags: 
X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: 
Message-ID: <bug-97119-4-6buKi2jLfc@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
In-Reply-To: <bug-97119-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
References: <bug-97119-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
MIME-Version: 1.0
List-Id: <gcc-bugs.sourceware.org>

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D97119

--- Comment #10 from Ali Bahrami <ali_gccbugzilla at emvision dot com> ---
> I think the issue described here are all covered by pr 63572

Can you explain how? I might not have followed it, but
pr 63572 seems to revolve around generating correct DWARF
content? Here, we're not reading the DWARF at all, so its
correctness isn't a factor. We're not really making any claims
about gcc correctness.

The problem here is that what these optimizations do
cause us difficulties in our simple mapping of addresses
to names, while the optimizations themselves don't have
enough impact to fight for. Hence, we'd like the option
to opt out.

- Ali=