From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
Received: by sourceware.org (Postfix, from userid 48)
	id 03C043858D28; Sun,  7 May 2023 15:59:22 +0000 (GMT)
DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 sourceware.org 03C043858D28
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gcc.gnu.org;
	s=default; t=1683475162;
	bh=B+NGWr0fZTVHHw5OaeRHp/YsrTraKZcF0rISOeyqyoY=;
	h=From:To:Subject:Date:In-Reply-To:References:From;
	b=WOvD01G2sqs7vplY/XLaT+nr/nCTssMidrZH9NTi/aB/Om3eLp671CWQYiHKcU6F+
	 Q3Ht3bFEEdfgUSA9dF/bIRlak6pWeK9zM/6tt5jg3rTMoS9K9BCqNZYEXawe7DDyxF
	 Blj1y9s7bC/kp3/CDlRj+uofHafyHL84UrJTfjWw=
From: "kargl at gcc dot gnu.org" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug fortran/97122] Spurious FINAL ... must be in the specification
 part of a MODULE
Date: Sun, 07 May 2023 15:59:21 +0000
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC
X-Bugzilla-Type: changed
X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None
X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc
X-Bugzilla-Component: fortran
X-Bugzilla-Version: 11.0
X-Bugzilla-Keywords: 
X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal
X-Bugzilla-Who: kargl at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Status: WAITING
X-Bugzilla-Resolution: 
X-Bugzilla-Priority: P4
X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: ---
X-Bugzilla-Flags: 
X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: 
Message-ID: <bug-97122-4-KdTjClJjTw@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
In-Reply-To: <bug-97122-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
References: <bug-97122-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
MIME-Version: 1.0
List-Id: <gcc-bugs.sourceware.org>

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D97122

--- Comment #7 from kargl at gcc dot gnu.org ---
(In reply to kargl from comment #5)
> (In reply to Paul Thomas from comment #3)
> >=20
> > I have marked this as "waiting" pending a contrary interpretation.
> >=20
> > Cheers
> >=20
>=20
> Paul,
>=20
> I asked on the J3 mailing list about the code.
>=20
> https://mailman.j3-fortran.org/pipermail/j3/2023-May/014193.html

I haven't had a response from a current member of J3.  Bob Corbett,
a former member, believes the code is valid Fortran.  Jeff Hammond
notes that Cray Fortran compiled the code.  So, we have Cray, Intel
compile the code.  NAG and gfortran reject it.  I'm not sure if there
are any other compilers with submodule support.=