From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: by sourceware.org (Postfix, from userid 48) id 566B9393C870; Sun, 20 Sep 2020 21:40:59 +0000 (GMT) DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 sourceware.org 566B9393C870 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gcc.gnu.org; s=default; t=1600638059; bh=pXgrNys9V1lgWniBtZ/yf9+HCKl+SvRAIAg2IGGTtt0=; h=From:To:Subject:Date:In-Reply-To:References:From; b=wLlIy4HmjiXXRnT/eKo0Jh/x5eiCcF9fQdET0wW/kCjiIENGn2ve4JIxjbGcILTWK nHQkWEXj6FiV9sIkgLZkiYccUj/Fr21kTHuw6xuDlhWeIOLXQcpI/T6UBXAkl6gOjU lZ2hilAc8XNXVm/48GTtpxsS1r/Gby0a/eftYTFY= From: "sandra at gcc dot gnu.org" To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org Subject: [Bug c/97125] [11 Regression] new problem with -Wduplicated-branches Date: Sun, 20 Sep 2020 21:40:59 +0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC X-Bugzilla-Type: changed X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc X-Bugzilla-Component: c X-Bugzilla-Version: unknown X-Bugzilla-Keywords: ice-on-valid-code X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal X-Bugzilla-Who: sandra at gcc dot gnu.org X-Bugzilla-Status: ASSIGNED X-Bugzilla-Resolution: X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3 X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: mpolacek at gcc dot gnu.org X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: 11.0 X-Bugzilla-Flags: X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated MIME-Version: 1.0 X-BeenThere: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Gcc-bugs mailing list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 20 Sep 2020 21:40:59 -0000 https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D97125 --- Comment #6 from sandra at gcc dot gnu.org --- Yeah, that looks like an easy fix. Thanks for tracking it down.=