From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
Received: by sourceware.org (Postfix, from userid 48)
 id E2DF53857838; Wed, 23 Sep 2020 05:36:38 +0000 (GMT)
DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 sourceware.org E2DF53857838
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gcc.gnu.org;
 s=default; t=1600839398;
 bh=C1ed0I3wEcItFg5BrhxpyWaWB80NrMJmuRmRud4hP7A=;
 h=From:To:Subject:Date:From;
 b=U7I8n1BQcUMiQdIaUFT7nAQhm4zcQh8iEZSsff17TEJmI6vd5oGJ3IqPWN5oqhCRb
 tikfWwDHLeAqoDKqB67iq1yhI5hLfbQB+s+tUZdX904uu1CsDF79k8XTR3lV5WkFCg
 Ub3lTuHRCFXuIZrh7SpXYZVwFyTWmAWaoOMcDOkc=
From: "rjiejie at me dot com" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug rtl-optimization/97170] New: Wrong optimization in fwprop pass
Date: Wed, 23 Sep 2020 05:36:38 +0000
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC
X-Bugzilla-Type: new
X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None
X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc
X-Bugzilla-Component: rtl-optimization
X-Bugzilla-Version: 8.1.0
X-Bugzilla-Keywords: 
X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal
X-Bugzilla-Who: rjiejie at me dot com
X-Bugzilla-Status: UNCONFIRMED
X-Bugzilla-Resolution: 
X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3
X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: ---
X-Bugzilla-Flags: 
X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: bug_id short_desc product version bug_status
 bug_severity priority component assigned_to reporter target_milestone
Message-ID: <bug-97170-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-BeenThere: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Gcc-bugs mailing list <gcc-bugs.gcc.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://gcc.gnu.org/mailman/options/gcc-bugs>,
 <mailto:gcc-bugs-request@gcc.gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://gcc.gnu.org/pipermail/gcc-bugs/>
List-Post: <mailto:gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gcc-bugs-request@gcc.gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://gcc.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/gcc-bugs>,
 <mailto:gcc-bugs-request@gcc.gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 23 Sep 2020 05:36:39 -0000

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D97170

            Bug ID: 97170
           Summary: Wrong optimization in fwprop pass
           Product: gcc
           Version: 8.1.0
            Status: UNCONFIRMED
          Severity: normal
          Priority: P3
         Component: rtl-optimization
          Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
          Reporter: rjiejie at me dot com
  Target Milestone: ---

insn seqs:

s1:

        __builtin_set_float_convert_mode(0);
        r1 =3D __builtin_load(a1, a2);
        r2 =3D __builtin_float_convert(r1);
        __builtin_store(a3, r2);
        __builtin_set_float_convert_mode(0);

s2:
        __builtin_set_float_convert_mode(1);
        r1 =3D __builtin_load(a1, a2);
        r2 =3D __builtin_float_convert(r1);
        __builtin_store(a3, r2);
        __builtin_set_float_convert_mode(0);


the diference of s1 and s2 only is "__builtin_set_float_convert_mode"

from beginning, the s1 mode is set 0, but s2 mode is set 1.

from optimization 'fwprop', the s2 insns seqs is deleted=20

as dead code, is it gcc bug ?



builtin patten of __builtin_set_float_convert_mode:


(define_insn "target_fcvtmode"
  [(set (reg:SI FCVTMODE_REGNUM)
        (unspec_volatile:SI [(match_operand:SI 0 "csr_operand" "rK")]
UNSPECV_FCVTMODE))]
  ""
  "fcvtmode\t%1"
)


builtin patten of __builtin_set_float_convert_mode:

(define_insn "target_fcvt"
  [(set (match_operand:SI 0 "register_operand" "=3Dr")
        (unspec:SI [(match_operand:SF 1 "register_operand" "f")]
        UNSPEC_FCVT))
   (use (reg:SI FCVTMODE_REGNUM))]
  ""
  "fcvt\t%0,%1"
)


As far as i know, __builtin_set_float_convert_mode depend on 'FCVTMODE_REGN=
UM'
which is from
__builtin_set_float_convert_mode, it's not dead code.

or something wrong in my pattens ?

Anyone could give me some hints ?

Thanks=