public inbox for gcc-bugs@sourceware.org help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org> To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org Subject: [Bug tree-optimization/97352] New: gcc.dg/vect/bb-slp-pr78205.c fails to vectorize all opportunities with AVX Date: Fri, 09 Oct 2020 11:05:34 +0000 [thread overview] Message-ID: <bug-97352-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/> (raw) https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97352 Bug ID: 97352 Summary: gcc.dg/vect/bb-slp-pr78205.c fails to vectorize all opportunities with AVX Product: gcc Version: 11.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: tree-optimization Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org Reporter: rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org Target Milestone: --- When using AVX vectors double x[2], a[4], b[4], c[5]; void foo () { a[0] = c[0]; a[1] = c[1]; a[2] = c[0]; a[3] = c[1]; b[0] = c[2]; b[1] = c[3]; b[2] = c[2]; b[3] = c[3]; x[0] = c[4]; x[1] = c[4]; } only vectorizes the x[] stores since the overall SLP analysis succeeds with V4DFmode but only parts of the opportunities are finally vectorized and thus SLP vectorization with V2DFmode isn't even tried. This is the issue that vector mode iteration works on wrong granularity. /home/rguenther/src/gcc3/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/vect/bb-slp-pr78205.c:17:8: note: === vect_slp_analyze_instance_dependence === /home/rguenther/src/gcc3/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/vect/bb-slp-pr78205.c:9:8: note: === vect_slp_analyze_instance_alignment === /home/rguenther/src/gcc3/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/vect/bb-slp-pr78205.c:9:8: note: removing SLP instance operations starting from: a[0] = _1; /home/rguenther/src/gcc3/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/vect/bb-slp-pr78205.c:13:8: note: === vect_slp_analyze_instance_alignment === /home/rguenther/src/gcc3/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/vect/bb-slp-pr78205.c:13:8: note: removing SLP instance operations starting from: b[0] = _3; /home/rguenther/src/gcc3/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/vect/bb-slp-pr78205.c:13:8: note: === vect_slp_analyze_operations === and the failure is because of the now late performed /* Analyze alignment of DRs of stmts in NODE. */ static bool vect_slp_analyze_node_alignment (vec_info *vinfo, slp_tree node) { ... /* We need to commit to a vector type for the group now. */ if (is_a <bb_vec_info> (vinfo) && !vect_update_shared_vectype (first_stmt_info, SLP_TREE_VECTYPE (node))) return false; because the other SLP instance (with x[] stores) set the vector type to V2DF while this one wants V4DF.
next reply other threads:[~2020-10-09 11:05 UTC|newest] Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top 2020-10-09 11:05 rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org [this message] 2020-10-12 7:29 ` [Bug tree-optimization/97352] " rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org 2020-10-13 11:47 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org 2021-09-02 10:18 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org 2021-09-10 12:24 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org 2021-09-27 8:24 ` cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org 2021-09-27 8:25 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
Reply instructions: You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email using any one of the following methods: * Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client, and reply-to-all from there: mbox Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style * Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to switches of git-send-email(1): git send-email \ --in-reply-to=bug-97352-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/ \ --to=gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org \ --cc=gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org \ /path/to/YOUR_REPLY https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html * If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header via mailto: links, try the mailto: linkBe sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox; as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).