From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: by sourceware.org (Postfix, from userid 48) id A974A3AA7C95; Tue, 20 Apr 2021 23:29:51 +0000 (GMT) DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 sourceware.org A974A3AA7C95 From: "cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org" To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org Subject: [Bug tree-optimization/97386] [8/9 Regression] wrong code with __builtin_bswap16() of rotated 64bit value Date: Tue, 20 Apr 2021 23:29:51 +0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC X-Bugzilla-Type: changed X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc X-Bugzilla-Component: tree-optimization X-Bugzilla-Version: 11.0 X-Bugzilla-Keywords: wrong-code X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal X-Bugzilla-Who: cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org X-Bugzilla-Status: ASSIGNED X-Bugzilla-Resolution: X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3 X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: jakub at gcc dot gnu.org X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: 8.5 X-Bugzilla-Flags: X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated MIME-Version: 1.0 X-BeenThere: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Gcc-bugs mailing list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 20 Apr 2021 23:29:51 -0000 https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D97386 --- Comment #7 from CVS Commits --- The releases/gcc-9 branch has been updated by Jakub Jelinek : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:1471e383f4909e7d6bd548d010eb96afcf2d241e commit r9-9390-g1471e383f4909e7d6bd548d010eb96afcf2d241e Author: Jakub Jelinek Date: Tue Oct 13 19:13:26 2020 +0200 combine: Fix up simplify_shift_const_1 for nested ROTATEs [PR97386] The following testcases are miscompiled (the first one since my improvements to rotate discovery on GIMPLE, the other one for many years) because combiner optimizes nested ROTATEs with narrowing SUBREG in between (i.e. the outer rotate is performed in shorter precision than the inner one) = to just one ROTATE of the rotated constant. While that (under certain conditions) can work for shifts, it can't work for rotates where we can only do that with rotates of the same precision. 2020-10-13 Jakub Jelinek PR rtl-optimization/97386 * combine.c (simplify_shift_const_1): Don't optimize nested ROT= ATEs if they have different modes. * gcc.c-torture/execute/pr97386-1.c: New test. * gcc.c-torture/execute/pr97386-2.c: New test. (cherry picked from commit 1a98b22b0468214ae8463d075dacaeea1d46df15)=