From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: by sourceware.org (Postfix, from userid 48) id 5FD6F38708C6; Tue, 13 Oct 2020 08:11:47 +0000 (GMT) DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 sourceware.org 5FD6F38708C6 From: "tschwinge at gcc dot gnu.org" To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org Subject: [Bug fortran/97390] Error compiling acc data present Date: Tue, 13 Oct 2020 08:11:47 +0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC X-Bugzilla-Type: changed X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc X-Bugzilla-Component: fortran X-Bugzilla-Version: 9.3.0 X-Bugzilla-Keywords: openacc X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal X-Bugzilla-Who: tschwinge at gcc dot gnu.org X-Bugzilla-Status: WAITING X-Bugzilla-Resolution: X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3 X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: tschwinge at gcc dot gnu.org X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: --- X-Bugzilla-Flags: X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: everconfirmed cc cf_reconfirmed_on bug_status assigned_to Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated MIME-Version: 1.0 X-BeenThere: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Gcc-bugs mailing list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 13 Oct 2020 08:11:48 -0000 https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D97390 Thomas Schwinge changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Ever confirmed|0 |1 CC| |burnus at gcc dot gnu.org, | |tschwinge at gcc dot gnu.o= rg Last reconfirmed| |2020-10-13 Status|UNCONFIRMED |WAITING Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |tschwinge at gcc do= t gnu.org --- Comment #1 from Thomas Schwinge --- Would it be the case that this line is longer than 132 characters? After t= his, "characters are ignored in typical free-form lines in the source file"; see= the '-ffree-line-length' option. Thus, does '-ffree-line-length-none' help? (I cannot comment on (a) why that's a useful limit to have, and (b) whether= the error reporting shouldn't be improved.)=