From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
Received: by sourceware.org (Postfix, from userid 48)
 id D10E1386103B; Thu, 12 Nov 2020 01:26:21 +0000 (GMT)
DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 sourceware.org D10E1386103B
From: "admin at levyhsu dot com" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug other/97417] RISC-V Unnecessary andi instruction when loading
 volatile bool
Date: Thu, 12 Nov 2020 01:26:21 +0000
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC
X-Bugzilla-Type: changed
X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None
X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc
X-Bugzilla-Component: other
X-Bugzilla-Version: 10.2.0
X-Bugzilla-Keywords: missed-optimization
X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal
X-Bugzilla-Who: admin at levyhsu dot com
X-Bugzilla-Status: NEW
X-Bugzilla-Resolution: 
X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3
X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: ---
X-Bugzilla-Flags: 
X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: 
Message-ID: <bug-97417-4-1AJPBO8Y9E@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
In-Reply-To: <bug-97417-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
References: <bug-97417-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-BeenThere: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Gcc-bugs mailing list <gcc-bugs.gcc.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://gcc.gnu.org/mailman/options/gcc-bugs>,
 <mailto:gcc-bugs-request@gcc.gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://gcc.gnu.org/pipermail/gcc-bugs/>
List-Post: <mailto:gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gcc-bugs-request@gcc.gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://gcc.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/gcc-bugs>,
 <mailto:gcc-bugs-request@gcc.gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 12 Nov 2020 01:26:21 -0000

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D97417

--- Comment #34 from Levy <admin at levyhsu dot com> ---
(In reply to Jim Wilson from comment #33)
> I did say that I'm willing to fix code style issues.  All major software
> projects I have worked with have coding style conventions.  It makes it
> easier to maintain a large software base when everything is using the same
> coding style.  We do have info to help you follow the GNU coding style.  =
See
> https://gcc.gnu.org/wiki/FormattingCodeForGCC
> which has emacs and vim settings to get the right code style.

No problem and thank you, Jim, I'll try to catch up the coding style.
what about the combine issue and shorten-memrefs?=20
Shall we fix it here or someplace else?=