From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
Received: by sourceware.org (Postfix, from userid 48)
 id E15CB3861881; Wed, 21 Oct 2020 18:38:54 +0000 (GMT)
DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 sourceware.org E15CB3861881
From: "marxin at gcc dot gnu.org" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug ipa/97445] Some fonctions marked static inline in Linux kernel
 are not inlined
Date: Wed, 21 Oct 2020 18:38:54 +0000
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC
X-Bugzilla-Type: changed
X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None
X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc
X-Bugzilla-Component: ipa
X-Bugzilla-Version: 10.1.0
X-Bugzilla-Keywords: missed-optimization
X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal
X-Bugzilla-Who: marxin at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Status: NEW
X-Bugzilla-Resolution: 
X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3
X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: ---
X-Bugzilla-Flags: 
X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: 
Message-ID: <bug-97445-4-Gcml83HO1s@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
In-Reply-To: <bug-97445-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
References: <bug-97445-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-BeenThere: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Gcc-bugs mailing list <gcc-bugs.gcc.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://gcc.gnu.org/mailman/options/gcc-bugs>,
 <mailto:gcc-bugs-request@gcc.gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://gcc.gnu.org/pipermail/gcc-bugs/>
List-Post: <mailto:gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gcc-bugs-request@gcc.gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://gcc.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/gcc-bugs>,
 <mailto:gcc-bugs-request@gcc.gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 21 Oct 2020 18:38:55 -0000

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D97445

--- Comment #55 from Martin Li=C5=A1ka <marxin at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
(In reply to Jan Hubicka from comment #54)
> > > It goes from 1 to 1<<63, so each of tests translates to a range.
> >=20
> > Yes, but these ranges are very large, nothing for a jump table or a bit=
-test.
> Yep, but theoretically you can recover the decision table and pattern
> match it is a bit builtin.  Not sure how many open coded bit builtins
> are there.

Such a pattern matching is a bit similar to PR90838.
Anyway, not planning to implement it now.=