From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: by sourceware.org (Postfix, from userid 48) id 291093857C52; Sat, 17 Oct 2020 03:15:40 +0000 (GMT) DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 sourceware.org 291093857C52 From: "davidledger at live dot com.au" To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org Subject: [Bug c++/97452] [coroutines] incorrect sequencing of await_resume() when multiple co_await expressions occur in a single statement Date: Sat, 17 Oct 2020 03:15:40 +0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC X-Bugzilla-Type: changed X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc X-Bugzilla-Component: c++ X-Bugzilla-Version: 10.2.0 X-Bugzilla-Keywords: wrong-code X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal X-Bugzilla-Who: davidledger at live dot com.au X-Bugzilla-Status: NEW X-Bugzilla-Resolution: X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3 X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: iains at gcc dot gnu.org X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: 10.3 X-Bugzilla-Flags: X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: cc Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated MIME-Version: 1.0 X-BeenThere: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Gcc-bugs mailing list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 17 Oct 2020 03:15:40 -0000 https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D97452 David Ledger changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |davidledger at live dot co= m.au --- Comment #2 from David Ledger --- I'm happy to use this thread for the issue, I can just repost my link to the same issue here. My reporting of the issue is here, but Lewis Bakers example is seperate. https://stackoverflow.com/questions/64348125/c20-coroutines-unexpected-reor= dering-of-await-resume-return-value-and-yield Is there anything I can do to help this issue get resolved? I've been throw= ing things at the wall trying to get something to stick (for a work around) but= so far nothing helps with this particular case.=