public inbox for gcc-bugs@sourceware.org
help / color / mirror / Atom feed
* [Bug c++/97475] New: An unnamed class with a typedef name for linkage purposes having a method.
@ 2020-10-17 21:48 anders.granlund.0 at gmail dot com
  2021-08-04 11:20 ` [Bug c++/97475] " redi at gcc dot gnu.org
                   ` (4 more replies)
  0 siblings, 5 replies; 6+ messages in thread
From: anders.granlund.0 at gmail dot com @ 2020-10-17 21:48 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: gcc-bugs

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97475

            Bug ID: 97475
           Summary: An unnamed class with a typedef name for linkage
                    purposes having a method.
           Product: gcc
           Version: unknown
            Status: UNCONFIRMED
          Severity: normal
          Priority: P3
         Component: c++
          Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
          Reporter: anders.granlund.0 at gmail dot com
  Target Milestone: ---

Consider the following c++ program:

  typedef struct {
    void f();
  } X;

  int main()
  {
  }

It is not rejected by the compiler when compiling with "-std=c++20
-pedantic-errors".

The expected behaviour is that it should be rejected by section 9.2.3 paragraph
10 in the c++ 20 standard:

"
 10 An unnamed class with a typedef name for linkage purposes shall not
(10.1) — declare any members other than non-static data members, member
enumerations, or member classes,
(10.2) — have any base classes or default member initializers, or
(10.3) — contain a lambda-expression,
and all member classes shall also satisfy these requirements (recursively).
"

Note that clang correctly does reject the program:

  https://godbolt.org/z/rTerza

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread

* [Bug c++/97475] An unnamed class with a typedef name for linkage purposes having a method.
  2020-10-17 21:48 [Bug c++/97475] New: An unnamed class with a typedef name for linkage purposes having a method anders.granlund.0 at gmail dot com
@ 2021-08-04 11:20 ` redi at gcc dot gnu.org
  2021-08-04 21:43 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org
                   ` (3 subsequent siblings)
  4 siblings, 0 replies; 6+ messages in thread
From: redi at gcc dot gnu.org @ 2021-08-04 11:20 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: gcc-bugs

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97475

Jonathan Wakely <redi at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
     Ever confirmed|0                           |1
             Status|UNCONFIRMED                 |NEW
   Last reconfirmed|                            |2021-08-04

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread

* [Bug c++/97475] An unnamed class with a typedef name for linkage purposes having a method.
  2020-10-17 21:48 [Bug c++/97475] New: An unnamed class with a typedef name for linkage purposes having a method anders.granlund.0 at gmail dot com
  2021-08-04 11:20 ` [Bug c++/97475] " redi at gcc dot gnu.org
@ 2021-08-04 21:43 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org
  2021-08-05 11:32 ` redi at gcc dot gnu.org
                   ` (2 subsequent siblings)
  4 siblings, 0 replies; 6+ messages in thread
From: pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org @ 2021-08-04 21:43 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: gcc-bugs

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97475

Andrew Pinski <pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
         Depends on|                            |46589

--- Comment #1 from Andrew Pinski <pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
I think this is a dup of bug 46589.


Referenced Bugs:

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46589
[Bug 46589] struct member function not declared global

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread

* [Bug c++/97475] An unnamed class with a typedef name for linkage purposes having a method.
  2020-10-17 21:48 [Bug c++/97475] New: An unnamed class with a typedef name for linkage purposes having a method anders.granlund.0 at gmail dot com
  2021-08-04 11:20 ` [Bug c++/97475] " redi at gcc dot gnu.org
  2021-08-04 21:43 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org
@ 2021-08-05 11:32 ` redi at gcc dot gnu.org
  2021-08-05 11:35 ` redi at gcc dot gnu.org
  2021-08-05 13:34 ` anders.granlund.0 at gmail dot com
  4 siblings, 0 replies; 6+ messages in thread
From: redi at gcc dot gnu.org @ 2021-08-05 11:32 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: gcc-bugs

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97475

--- Comment #2 from Jonathan Wakely <redi at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
Well that's about the linkage of such entities, this is about whether they are
ill-formed.

The rule that makes this ill-formed was added by https://wg21.link/p1766r1 but
was approved as a defect report against previous standards.

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread

* [Bug c++/97475] An unnamed class with a typedef name for linkage purposes having a method.
  2020-10-17 21:48 [Bug c++/97475] New: An unnamed class with a typedef name for linkage purposes having a method anders.granlund.0 at gmail dot com
                   ` (2 preceding siblings ...)
  2021-08-05 11:32 ` redi at gcc dot gnu.org
@ 2021-08-05 11:35 ` redi at gcc dot gnu.org
  2021-08-05 13:34 ` anders.granlund.0 at gmail dot com
  4 siblings, 0 replies; 6+ messages in thread
From: redi at gcc dot gnu.org @ 2021-08-05 11:35 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: gcc-bugs

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97475

--- Comment #3 from Jonathan Wakely <redi at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
Maybe we should make this ill-formed for C++20, and a pedwarn otherwise, so
existing code continues to compile using previous standards.

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread

* [Bug c++/97475] An unnamed class with a typedef name for linkage purposes having a method.
  2020-10-17 21:48 [Bug c++/97475] New: An unnamed class with a typedef name for linkage purposes having a method anders.granlund.0 at gmail dot com
                   ` (3 preceding siblings ...)
  2021-08-05 11:35 ` redi at gcc dot gnu.org
@ 2021-08-05 13:34 ` anders.granlund.0 at gmail dot com
  4 siblings, 0 replies; 6+ messages in thread
From: anders.granlund.0 at gmail dot com @ 2021-08-05 13:34 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: gcc-bugs

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97475

--- Comment #4 from Anders Granlund <anders.granlund.0 at gmail dot com> ---
Sounds good to me!

On Thu, 5 Aug 2021, 13:35 redi at gcc dot gnu.org, <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
wrote:

> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97475
>
> --- Comment #3 from Jonathan Wakely <redi at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
> Maybe we should make this ill-formed for C++20, and a pedwarn otherwise, so
> existing code continues to compile using previous standards.
>
> --
> You are receiving this mail because:
> You reported the bug.

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread

end of thread, other threads:[~2021-08-05 13:34 UTC | newest]

Thread overview: 6+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2020-10-17 21:48 [Bug c++/97475] New: An unnamed class with a typedef name for linkage purposes having a method anders.granlund.0 at gmail dot com
2021-08-04 11:20 ` [Bug c++/97475] " redi at gcc dot gnu.org
2021-08-04 21:43 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org
2021-08-05 11:32 ` redi at gcc dot gnu.org
2021-08-05 11:35 ` redi at gcc dot gnu.org
2021-08-05 13:34 ` anders.granlund.0 at gmail dot com

This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).