* [Bug c++/97663] [c++17] Function with return type 'unsigned' in nested namespace misinterpreted as deduction guide
2020-11-01 15:07 [Bug c++/97663] New: [c++17] Function with return type 'unsigned' in nested namespace misinterpreted as deduction guide hans.dembinski at gmail dot com
@ 2020-11-01 16:54 ` ville.voutilainen at gmail dot com
2020-11-02 11:00 ` jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
` (7 subsequent siblings)
8 siblings, 0 replies; 10+ messages in thread
From: ville.voutilainen at gmail dot com @ 2020-11-01 16:54 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97663
Ville Voutilainen <ville.voutilainen at gmail dot com> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
CC| |jason at redhat dot com
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Ever confirmed|0 |1
Last reconfirmed| |2020-11-01
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 10+ messages in thread
* [Bug c++/97663] [c++17] Function with return type 'unsigned' in nested namespace misinterpreted as deduction guide
2020-11-01 15:07 [Bug c++/97663] New: [c++17] Function with return type 'unsigned' in nested namespace misinterpreted as deduction guide hans.dembinski at gmail dot com
2020-11-01 16:54 ` [Bug c++/97663] " ville.voutilainen at gmail dot com
@ 2020-11-02 11:00 ` jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
2020-11-02 11:40 ` jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
` (6 subsequent siblings)
8 siblings, 0 replies; 10+ messages in thread
From: jakub at gcc dot gnu.org @ 2020-11-02 11:00 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97663
Jakub Jelinek <jakub at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
CC| |jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #1 from Jakub Jelinek <jakub at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
Started with r7-6608-ga56c0ac08242269bbcc4bd1f480eda2378336776
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 10+ messages in thread
* [Bug c++/97663] [c++17] Function with return type 'unsigned' in nested namespace misinterpreted as deduction guide
2020-11-01 15:07 [Bug c++/97663] New: [c++17] Function with return type 'unsigned' in nested namespace misinterpreted as deduction guide hans.dembinski at gmail dot com
2020-11-01 16:54 ` [Bug c++/97663] " ville.voutilainen at gmail dot com
2020-11-02 11:00 ` jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
@ 2020-11-02 11:40 ` jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
2020-11-03 20:43 ` cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org
` (5 subsequent siblings)
8 siblings, 0 replies; 10+ messages in thread
From: jakub at gcc dot gnu.org @ 2020-11-02 11:40 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97663
Jakub Jelinek <jakub at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #2 from Jakub Jelinek <jakub at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
Created attachment 49486
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=49486&action=edit
gcc11-pr97663.patch
Only lightly tested fix (so far), passes check-c++-all without regressions.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 10+ messages in thread
* [Bug c++/97663] [c++17] Function with return type 'unsigned' in nested namespace misinterpreted as deduction guide
2020-11-01 15:07 [Bug c++/97663] New: [c++17] Function with return type 'unsigned' in nested namespace misinterpreted as deduction guide hans.dembinski at gmail dot com
` (2 preceding siblings ...)
2020-11-02 11:40 ` jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
@ 2020-11-03 20:43 ` cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org
2020-11-12 10:05 ` cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org
` (4 subsequent siblings)
8 siblings, 0 replies; 10+ messages in thread
From: cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org @ 2020-11-03 20:43 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97663
--- Comment #3 from CVS Commits <cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
The master branch has been updated by Jakub Jelinek <jakub@gcc.gnu.org>:
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:875225301e356759982573d5578ed7ca54f81f86
commit r11-4695-g875225301e356759982573d5578ed7ca54f81f86
Author: Jakub Jelinek <jakub@redhat.com>
Date: Tue Nov 3 21:42:51 2020 +0100
c++: Don't try to parse a function declaration as deduction guide [PR97663]
While these function declarations have NULL decl_specifiers->type,
they have still type specifiers specified from which the default int
in the return type is added, so we shouldn't try to parse those as
deduction guides.
2020-11-03 Jakub Jelinek <jakub@redhat.com>
PR c++/97663
* parser.c (cp_parser_init_declarator): Don't try to parse
C++17 deduction guides if there are any type specifiers even when
type is NULL.
* g++.dg/cpp1z/class-deduction75.C: New test.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 10+ messages in thread
* [Bug c++/97663] [c++17] Function with return type 'unsigned' in nested namespace misinterpreted as deduction guide
2020-11-01 15:07 [Bug c++/97663] New: [c++17] Function with return type 'unsigned' in nested namespace misinterpreted as deduction guide hans.dembinski at gmail dot com
` (3 preceding siblings ...)
2020-11-03 20:43 ` cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org
@ 2020-11-12 10:05 ` cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org
2021-04-20 23:30 ` cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org
` (3 subsequent siblings)
8 siblings, 0 replies; 10+ messages in thread
From: cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org @ 2020-11-12 10:05 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97663
--- Comment #4 from CVS Commits <cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
The releases/gcc-10 branch has been updated by Jakub Jelinek
<jakub@gcc.gnu.org>:
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:cd41e4a1864c10c7f9141284e82e5cc0a3007806
commit r10-9008-gcd41e4a1864c10c7f9141284e82e5cc0a3007806
Author: Jakub Jelinek <jakub@redhat.com>
Date: Tue Nov 3 21:42:51 2020 +0100
c++: Don't try to parse a function declaration as deduction guide [PR97663]
While these function declarations have NULL decl_specifiers->type,
they have still type specifiers specified from which the default int
in the return type is added, so we shouldn't try to parse those as
deduction guides.
2020-11-03 Jakub Jelinek <jakub@redhat.com>
PR c++/97663
* parser.c (cp_parser_init_declarator): Don't try to parse
C++17 deduction guides if there are any type specifiers even when
type is NULL.
* g++.dg/cpp1z/class-deduction75.C: New test.
(cherry picked from commit 875225301e356759982573d5578ed7ca54f81f86)
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 10+ messages in thread
* [Bug c++/97663] [c++17] Function with return type 'unsigned' in nested namespace misinterpreted as deduction guide
2020-11-01 15:07 [Bug c++/97663] New: [c++17] Function with return type 'unsigned' in nested namespace misinterpreted as deduction guide hans.dembinski at gmail dot com
` (4 preceding siblings ...)
2020-11-12 10:05 ` cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org
@ 2021-04-20 23:30 ` cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org
2021-04-22 16:48 ` cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org
` (2 subsequent siblings)
8 siblings, 0 replies; 10+ messages in thread
From: cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org @ 2021-04-20 23:30 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97663
--- Comment #5 from CVS Commits <cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
The releases/gcc-9 branch has been updated by Jakub Jelinek
<jakub@gcc.gnu.org>:
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:c3a583316776a399fea9eb79019245138a2be181
commit r9-9392-gc3a583316776a399fea9eb79019245138a2be181
Author: Jakub Jelinek <jakub@redhat.com>
Date: Tue Nov 3 21:42:51 2020 +0100
c++: Don't try to parse a function declaration as deduction guide [PR97663]
While these function declarations have NULL decl_specifiers->type,
they have still type specifiers specified from which the default int
in the return type is added, so we shouldn't try to parse those as
deduction guides.
2020-11-03 Jakub Jelinek <jakub@redhat.com>
PR c++/97663
* parser.c (cp_parser_init_declarator): Don't try to parse
C++17 deduction guides if there are any type specifiers even when
type is NULL.
* g++.dg/cpp1z/class-deduction75.C: New test.
(cherry picked from commit cd41e4a1864c10c7f9141284e82e5cc0a3007806)
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 10+ messages in thread
* [Bug c++/97663] [c++17] Function with return type 'unsigned' in nested namespace misinterpreted as deduction guide
2020-11-01 15:07 [Bug c++/97663] New: [c++17] Function with return type 'unsigned' in nested namespace misinterpreted as deduction guide hans.dembinski at gmail dot com
` (5 preceding siblings ...)
2021-04-20 23:30 ` cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org
@ 2021-04-22 16:48 ` cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org
2021-04-22 17:07 ` jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
2021-09-11 14:29 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org
8 siblings, 0 replies; 10+ messages in thread
From: cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org @ 2021-04-22 16:48 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97663
--- Comment #6 from CVS Commits <cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
The releases/gcc-8 branch has been updated by Jakub Jelinek
<jakub@gcc.gnu.org>:
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:a35abb48b025291cabc364c1b335d3f675e9e97f
commit r8-10862-ga35abb48b025291cabc364c1b335d3f675e9e97f
Author: Jakub Jelinek <jakub@redhat.com>
Date: Tue Nov 3 21:42:51 2020 +0100
c++: Don't try to parse a function declaration as deduction guide [PR97663]
While these function declarations have NULL decl_specifiers->type,
they have still type specifiers specified from which the default int
in the return type is added, so we shouldn't try to parse those as
deduction guides.
2020-11-03 Jakub Jelinek <jakub@redhat.com>
PR c++/97663
* parser.c (cp_parser_init_declarator): Don't try to parse
C++17 deduction guides if there are any type specifiers even when
type is NULL.
* g++.dg/cpp1z/class-deduction75.C: New test.
(cherry picked from commit cd41e4a1864c10c7f9141284e82e5cc0a3007806)
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 10+ messages in thread
* [Bug c++/97663] [c++17] Function with return type 'unsigned' in nested namespace misinterpreted as deduction guide
2020-11-01 15:07 [Bug c++/97663] New: [c++17] Function with return type 'unsigned' in nested namespace misinterpreted as deduction guide hans.dembinski at gmail dot com
` (6 preceding siblings ...)
2021-04-22 16:48 ` cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org
@ 2021-04-22 17:07 ` jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
2021-09-11 14:29 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org
8 siblings, 0 replies; 10+ messages in thread
From: jakub at gcc dot gnu.org @ 2021-04-22 17:07 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97663
Jakub Jelinek <jakub at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Status|ASSIGNED |RESOLVED
Resolution|--- |FIXED
--- Comment #7 from Jakub Jelinek <jakub at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
Fixed.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 10+ messages in thread
* [Bug c++/97663] [c++17] Function with return type 'unsigned' in nested namespace misinterpreted as deduction guide
2020-11-01 15:07 [Bug c++/97663] New: [c++17] Function with return type 'unsigned' in nested namespace misinterpreted as deduction guide hans.dembinski at gmail dot com
` (7 preceding siblings ...)
2021-04-22 17:07 ` jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
@ 2021-09-11 14:29 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org
8 siblings, 0 replies; 10+ messages in thread
From: pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org @ 2021-09-11 14:29 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97663
Andrew Pinski <pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Target Milestone|--- |8.5
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 10+ messages in thread