From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
Received: by sourceware.org (Postfix, from userid 48)
	id D6B433858C53; Wed, 14 Jun 2023 04:02:42 +0000 (GMT)
DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 sourceware.org D6B433858C53
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gcc.gnu.org;
	s=default; t=1686715362;
	bh=188KBGdD2bUM9cZm1Aq92CRFl1vt3U3cvTUz11gK0LM=;
	h=From:To:Subject:Date:In-Reply-To:References:From;
	b=j2lbEj2GwrD39ktJGcBmLaFLue5ygqnCgbsgqQhjEF7elsPyKQf8abbB10oHfDV1R
	 bsHIdF4PBM8Nu913mulq9v5qte1WGP2L0Woennz/s8HPbCbAlYi1EUbrzesm/5gHRj
	 hLBbJzQ5FoMxJ8dfyxBO1TRc95RhB4xjh9SvJ0EU=
From: "pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug c++/97665] constexpr union array member incorrectly rejected as
 non-constexpr
Date: Wed, 14 Jun 2023 04:02:42 +0000
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC
X-Bugzilla-Type: changed
X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None
X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc
X-Bugzilla-Component: c++
X-Bugzilla-Version: 11.0
X-Bugzilla-Keywords: rejects-valid
X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal
X-Bugzilla-Who: pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Status: NEW
X-Bugzilla-Resolution: 
X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3
X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: ---
X-Bugzilla-Flags: 
X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: 
Message-ID: <bug-97665-4-OKi67l98nU@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
In-Reply-To: <bug-97665-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
References: <bug-97665-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
MIME-Version: 1.0
List-Id: <gcc-bugs.sourceware.org>

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D97665

--- Comment #12 from Andrew Pinski <pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
(In reply to Jiang An from comment #11)
> This looks like CWG issue 2558 (currently unresolved).
>=20
> https://cplusplus.github.io/CWG/issues/2558.html

It was voted in a few months after this comment was added.

But the original testcase has no scalars ...=