From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: by sourceware.org (Postfix, from userid 48) id 6064F3851C1A; Thu, 5 Nov 2020 13:48:39 +0000 (GMT) DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 sourceware.org 6064F3851C1A From: "redi at gcc dot gnu.org" To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org Subject: [Bug libstdc++/97729] Link failure due to basic_stringbuf and others when building DLL on MinGW Date: Thu, 05 Nov 2020 13:48:39 +0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC X-Bugzilla-Type: changed X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc X-Bugzilla-Component: libstdc++ X-Bugzilla-Version: 11.0 X-Bugzilla-Keywords: X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal X-Bugzilla-Who: redi at gcc dot gnu.org X-Bugzilla-Status: ASSIGNED X-Bugzilla-Resolution: X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3 X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: redi at gcc dot gnu.org X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: --- X-Bugzilla-Flags: X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: bug_status assigned_to everconfirmed cf_reconfirmed_on attachments.created Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated MIME-Version: 1.0 X-BeenThere: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Gcc-bugs mailing list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 05 Nov 2020 13:48:39 -0000 https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D97729 Jonathan Wakely changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |redi at gcc dot gnu= .org Ever confirmed|0 |1 Last reconfirmed| |2020-11-05 --- Comment #1 from Jonathan Wakely --- Created attachment 49505 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=3D49505&action=3Dedit Instantiate and export missing constructor I can't reproduce this with a x86_64-w64-mingw32 cross-compiler built on li= nux, nor with a native linux compiler. But this patch should fix it, could you t= est it please?=