From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: by sourceware.org (Postfix, from userid 48) id 12B0B38493DE; Fri, 24 Mar 2023 16:10:28 +0000 (GMT) DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 sourceware.org 12B0B38493DE DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gcc.gnu.org; s=default; t=1679674228; bh=1+EWlEaUHchfiuE97nMJCk5ZxrqTBmcdSQrnOhWl5B4=; h=From:To:Subject:Date:In-Reply-To:References:From; b=jVXQ87F6zmLYKKVGHkhGcEDqKR2+QX3haNM5rxEFxxXDckbbYtNpTGkkgFfXkUSpN ZR83rLPLFmYePkQ1hKLES7+2BIgzvVfo75A4iJFkn2gpWRFoXpz3VNp8OytIUcGBVS 37mc2R0i9xyLCbetE00MKwwpWG35XvytwBEimA48= From: "ppalka at gcc dot gnu.org" To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org Subject: [Bug c++/97740] [10/11/12/13 Regression] Weird error message about accessing a private member of my own class inside of std::string_view inside of constexpr Date: Fri, 24 Mar 2023 16:10:27 +0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC X-Bugzilla-Type: changed X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc X-Bugzilla-Component: c++ X-Bugzilla-Version: 11.0 X-Bugzilla-Keywords: rejects-valid X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal X-Bugzilla-Who: ppalka at gcc dot gnu.org X-Bugzilla-Status: NEW X-Bugzilla-Resolution: X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3 X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: 10.5 X-Bugzilla-Flags: X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated MIME-Version: 1.0 List-Id: https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D97740 --- Comment #4 from Patrick Palka --- A C++14 version that's more similar to the original testcase using a generic lambda and dependent initializer: struct A { constexpr const int* get() const { return &m; } private: int m =3D 42; } a; struct B { const int* p; }; template void f() { [] (auto) { constexpr B b =3D {arg->get()}; }(0); } template void f<&a>();=