From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: by sourceware.org (Postfix, from userid 48) id 63F7A385782A; Wed, 28 Apr 2021 07:20:31 +0000 (GMT) DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 sourceware.org 63F7A385782A From: "jakub at gcc dot gnu.org" To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org Subject: [Bug rtl-optimization/97756] [9/10/11/12 Regression] Inefficient handling of 128-bit arguments Date: Wed, 28 Apr 2021 07:20:31 +0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC X-Bugzilla-Type: changed X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc X-Bugzilla-Component: rtl-optimization X-Bugzilla-Version: 11.0 X-Bugzilla-Keywords: missed-optimization, ra X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal X-Bugzilla-Who: jakub at gcc dot gnu.org X-Bugzilla-Status: NEW X-Bugzilla-Resolution: X-Bugzilla-Priority: P2 X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: 9.4 X-Bugzilla-Flags: X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: bug_severity cc short_desc cf_reconfirmed_on everconfirmed bug_status priority target_milestone Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated MIME-Version: 1.0 X-BeenThere: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Gcc-bugs mailing list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 28 Apr 2021 07:20:31 -0000 https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D97756 Jakub Jelinek changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Severity|enhancement |normal CC| |jakub at gcc dot gnu.org, | |vmakarov at gcc dot gnu.org Summary|Inefficient handling of |[9/10/11/12 Regression] |128-bit arguments |Inefficient handling of | |128-bit arguments Last reconfirmed| |2021-04-28 Ever confirmed|0 |1 Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Priority|P3 |P2 Target Milestone|--- |9.4 --- Comment #5 from Jakub Jelinek --- On the __uint128_t f(__uint128_t x, __uint128_t y) { return x + y; } __uint128_t g(__uint128_t x, __uint128_t y) { return y + x; } testcase with -O2 this regressed with r9-6788-g0d2a576a1417b8d4526d369fef1d87cee2c49f99=