public inbox for gcc-bugs@sourceware.org
help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug c++/97790] constexpr evaluation reports false positive memory leak
Date: Thu, 12 Nov 2020 10:06:05 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <bug-97790-4-eUb8Rf6FUT@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <bug-97790-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97790

--- Comment #5 from CVS Commits <cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
The releases/gcc-10 branch has been updated by Jakub Jelinek
<jakub@gcc.gnu.org>:

https://gcc.gnu.org/g:d183dd5ca42bbfc1f840c59ffe2e42fbd6860707

commit r10-9012-gd183dd5ca42bbfc1f840c59ffe2e42fbd6860707
Author: Jakub Jelinek <jakub@redhat.com>
Date:   Thu Nov 12 10:46:04 2020 +0100

    c++: Fix up constexpr CLEANUP_POINT_EXPR and TRY_FINALLY_EXPR handling
[PR97790]

    As the testcase shows, CLEANUP_POINT_EXPR (and I think TRY_FINALLY_EXPR
too)
    suffer from the same problem that I was trying to fix in
    r10-3597-g1006c9d4395a939820df76f37c7b085a4a1a003f
    for CLEANUP_STMT, namely that if in the middle of the body expression of
    those stmts is e.g. return stmt, goto, break or continue (something that
    changes *jump_target and makes it start skipping stmts), we then skip the
    cleanups too, which is not appropriate - the cleanups were either queued up
    during the non-skipping execution of the body (for CLEANUP_POINT_EXPR), or
    for TRY_FINALLY_EXPR are relevant already after entering the body block.

    > Would it make sense to always use a NULL jump_target when evaluating
    > cleanups?

    I was afraid of that, especially for TRY_FINALLY_EXPR, but it seems that
    during constexpr evaluation the cleanups will most often be just very
simple
    destructor calls (or calls to cleanup attribute functions).
    Furthermore, for neither of these 3 tree codes we'll reach that code if
    jump_target && *jump_target initially (there is a return NULL_TREE much
    earlier for those except for trees that could embed labels etc. in it and
    clearly these 3 don't count in that).

    2020-11-12  Jakub Jelinek  <jakub@redhat.com>

            PR c++/97790
            * constexpr.c (cxx_eval_constant_expression) <case
CLEANUP_POINT_EXPR,
            case TRY_FINALLY_EXPR, case CLEANUP_STMT>: Don't pass jump_target
to
            cxx_eval_constant_expression when evaluating the cleanups.

            * g++.dg/cpp2a/constexpr-dtor9.C: New test.

    (cherry picked from commit fc531c2ed3ce456efca946e995544b216b3c16df)

  parent reply	other threads:[~2020-11-12 10:06 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2020-11-10 21:09 [Bug c++/97790] New: " ldalessandro at gmail dot com
2020-11-10 21:31 ` [Bug c++/97790] " ldalessandro at gmail dot com
2020-11-11 12:22 ` jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
2020-11-11 13:04 ` jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
2020-11-12  9:48 ` cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org
2020-11-12 10:06 ` cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org [this message]
2020-11-12 10:54 ` jakub at gcc dot gnu.org

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=bug-97790-4-eUb8Rf6FUT@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/ \
    --to=gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org \
    --cc=gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).