public inbox for gcc-bugs@sourceware.org help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org> To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org Subject: [Bug libstdc++/97798] FTB msp430-elf error: the value of '__gnu_cxx::__numeric_traits_integer<__int20>::__max' is not usable in a constant expression Date: Thu, 12 Nov 2020 12:11:26 +0000 [thread overview] Message-ID: <bug-97798-4-bcVR5yJiXo@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/> (raw) In-Reply-To: <bug-97798-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97798 --- Comment #10 from CVS Commits <cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org> --- The master branch has been updated by Jonathan Wakely <redi@gcc.gnu.org>: https://gcc.gnu.org/g:7f851c33411fc39982c62a91fa93ec02981fd956 commit r11-4941-g7f851c33411fc39982c62a91fa93ec02981fd956 Author: Jonathan Wakely <jwakely@redhat.com> Date: Thu Nov 12 10:29:21 2020 +0000 libstdc++: Fix __numeric_traits_integer<__int20> [PR 97798] The expression used to calculate the maximum value for an integer type assumes that the number of bits in the value representation is always sizeof(T) * CHAR_BIT. This is not true for the __int20 type on msp430, which has only 20 bits in the value representation but 32 bits in the object representation. This causes an integer overflow in a constant expression, which is ill-formed. This problem was already solved by DJ for std::numeric_limits<__int20> by generalizing the helper macros to use a specified number of bits instead of assuming sizeof(T) * CHAR_BIT. Then the INT_N_n types can specify the number of bits using the __GLIBCXX_BITSIZE_INT_N_n macros that the compiler defines. I'm using a slightly different approach here. I've replaced the helper macros entirely, and just expanded the calculations in the initializers for the static data members. By reordering the data members we can reuse __is_signed and __digits in the other initializers. This removes the repetition of expanding __glibcxx_signed(T) and __glibcxx_digits(T) multiple times in each initializer. The __is_integer_nonstrict trait now defines a new constant, __width, which is sizeof(T) * CHAR_BIT by default (defined as an enumerator so that no storage is needed for a static data member). By specializing __is_integer_nonstrict for the INT_N types that have padding bits, we can provide the correct width via the __GLIBCXX_BITSIZE_INT_N_n macros. libstdc++-v3/ChangeLog: PR libstdc++/97798 * include/ext/numeric_traits.h (__glibcxx_signed) (__glibcxx_digits, __glibcxx_min, __glibcxx_max): Remove macros. (__is_integer_nonstrict::__width): Define new constant. (__numeric_traits_integer): Define constants in terms of each other and __is_integer_nonstrict::__width, rather than the removed macros. (_GLIBCXX_INT_N_TRAITS): Macro to define explicit specializations for non-standard integer types.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2020-11-12 12:11 UTC|newest] Thread overview: 25+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top 2020-11-11 13:55 [Bug c++/97798] New: " jozefl at gcc dot gnu.org 2020-11-11 14:38 ` [Bug c++/97798] " mpolacek at gcc dot gnu.org 2020-11-11 14:56 ` jozefl at gcc dot gnu.org 2020-11-11 15:26 ` mpolacek at gcc dot gnu.org 2020-11-11 15:51 ` mpolacek at gcc dot gnu.org 2020-11-11 18:37 ` mpolacek at gcc dot gnu.org 2020-11-12 0:03 ` redi at gcc dot gnu.org 2020-11-12 0:36 ` [Bug libstdc++/97798] " redi at gcc dot gnu.org 2020-11-12 0:38 ` redi at gcc dot gnu.org 2020-11-12 10:00 ` jozefl at gcc dot gnu.org 2020-11-12 12:11 ` cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org [this message] 2020-11-12 12:13 ` redi at gcc dot gnu.org 2020-11-12 12:30 ` jozefl at gcc dot gnu.org 2020-11-12 14:27 ` redi at gcc dot gnu.org 2020-11-12 16:06 ` jozefl at gcc dot gnu.org 2020-11-12 17:43 ` redi at gcc dot gnu.org 2020-11-12 19:31 ` jozefl at gcc dot gnu.org 2020-11-12 19:32 ` redi at gcc dot gnu.org 2020-11-13 13:24 ` redi at gcc dot gnu.org 2020-11-13 13:49 ` jozefl at gcc dot gnu.org 2020-11-13 14:52 ` cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org 2020-11-13 14:55 ` cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org 2020-11-13 14:57 ` redi at gcc dot gnu.org 2020-11-13 15:12 ` jozefl at gcc dot gnu.org 2020-11-13 15:30 ` redi at gcc dot gnu.org
Reply instructions: You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email using any one of the following methods: * Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client, and reply-to-all from there: mbox Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style * Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to switches of git-send-email(1): git send-email \ --in-reply-to=bug-97798-4-bcVR5yJiXo@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/ \ --to=gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org \ --cc=gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org \ /path/to/YOUR_REPLY https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html * If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header via mailto: links, try the mailto: linkBe sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox; as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).