From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
Received: by sourceware.org (Postfix, from userid 48)
	id EF65A385DC30; Fri,  7 Jul 2023 09:19:39 +0000 (GMT)
DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 sourceware.org EF65A385DC30
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gcc.gnu.org;
	s=default; t=1688721579;
	bh=E0xq4zbGg+wbRoXRvfcSS02lkGlPrxxswh0X7rRGvxU=;
	h=From:To:Subject:Date:In-Reply-To:References:From;
	b=ZjE28HC9zGwi2I2NkKmH/8oxVs9wQ1Hn2ZtToAwvuQWMG4ihMzVl5wjcFArnpKAOC
	 khKGde29ac0jVYHkQivY99Wf/7ht36OeJyJNCyoBeUQfPDHl79lnLu8auywP5dFmfR
	 /0MJHb9ZL2QD5pAbB1SqJnqLEdrhxl8CVOAnroSI=
From: "pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: =?UTF-8?B?W0J1ZyBjKysvOTc5OTBdIFsxMC8xMS8xMi8xMy8xNCBSZWdyZXNz?=
 =?UTF-8?B?aW9uXSBJQ0U6IOKAmHZlcmlmeV90eXBl4oCZIGZhaWxlZCB3aXRoIHZlY3Rv?=
 =?UTF-8?B?ciB0eXBlcyBhbmQgbm9uLVBPRHMgc2luY2UgcjYtNTIyMi1nYmE2YTZhMWQ0?=
 =?UTF-8?B?NGMxN2YyNQ==?=
Date: Fri, 07 Jul 2023 09:19:39 +0000
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC
X-Bugzilla-Type: changed
X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None
X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc
X-Bugzilla-Component: c++
X-Bugzilla-Version: 10.2.1
X-Bugzilla-Keywords: ice-on-valid-code, lto
X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal
X-Bugzilla-Who: pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Status: NEW
X-Bugzilla-Resolution: 
X-Bugzilla-Priority: P2
X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: 10.5
X-Bugzilla-Flags: 
X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: 
Message-ID: <bug-97990-4-b9paZDdDGt@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
In-Reply-To: <bug-97990-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
References: <bug-97990-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
MIME-Version: 1.0
List-Id: <gcc-bugs.sourceware.org>

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D97990

--- Comment #8 from Andrew Pinski <pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
(In reply to Andrew Pinski from comment #7)
> The min option set required is `-flto -O2  -Wstrict-aliasing`

Actually it is just: `-flto  -fstrict-aliasing  -Wstrict-aliasing`

I wonder how the aliasing set is being set for the `type variant` here ...=