public inbox for gcc-bugs@sourceware.org help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "ishikawa at yk dot rim.or.jp" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org> To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org Subject: [Bug ipa/98000] New: g++-10 internal compiler error: verify_cgraph_node failed Date: Thu, 26 Nov 2020 06:08:53 +0000 [thread overview] Message-ID: <bug-98000-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/> (raw) https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98000 Bug ID: 98000 Summary: g++-10 internal compiler error: verify_cgraph_node failed Product: gcc Version: og10 (devel/omp/gcc-10) Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: ipa Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org Reporter: ishikawa at yk dot rim.or.jp CC: marxin at gcc dot gnu.org Target Milestone: --- Created attachment 49631 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=49631&action=edit Gzipped preprocessed source file that led to the internal compiler error. While compillng mozilla thunderbird mail client for local build, I get the following error. hh:1466:16: internal compiler error: verify_cgraph_node failed 0xdb670e cgraph_node::verify_node() ../../src/gcc/cgraph.c:3812 0xda9914 symtab_node::verify() ../../src/gcc/symtab.c:1312 0x12caa34 optimize_inline_calls(tree_node*) ../../src/gcc/tree-inline.c:5432 0x100c9a3 inline_transform(cgraph_node*) ../../src/gcc/ipa-inline-transform.c:736 0x115652d execute_one_ipa_transform_pass ../../src/gcc/passes.c:2233 0x115652d execute_all_ipa_transforms(bool) ../../src/gcc/passes.c:2272 0xdbc0d3 cgraph_node::expand() ../../src/gcc/cgraphunit.c:2293 0xdbd67f expand_all_functions ../../src/gcc/cgraphunit.c:2471 0xdbd67f symbol_table::compile() ../../src/gcc/cgraphunit.c:2834 0xdbfa6c symbol_table::compile() ../../src/gcc/cgraphunit.c:2747 0xdbfa6c symbol_table::finalize_compilation_unit() ../../src/gcc/cgraphunit.c:3014 Please submit a full bug report, with preprocessed source if appropriate. Please include the complete backtrace with any bug report. See <file:///usr/share/doc/gcc-10/README.Bugs> for instructions. I am attaching the preprocessed source file. The command that led to this bug is as follows (assuming the preprocessed file is placed in /tmp ) /usr/bin/g++-10 -std=gnu++17 -o Unified_cpp_gfx_harfbuzz_src0.o -c -I/NEW-SSD/moz-obj-dir/objdir-tb3/dist/stl_wrappers -I/NEW-SSD/moz-obj-dir/objdir-tb3/dist/system_wrappers -include /NEW-SSD/NREF-COMM-CENTRAL/mozilla/config/gcc_hidden.h -U_FORTIFY_SOURCE -D_FORTIFY_SOURCE=2 -fstack-protector-strong -UDEBUG '-DPACKAGE_VERSION="moz"' '-DPACKAGE_BUGREPORT="http://bugzilla.mozilla.org/"' -DHAVE_OT=1 -DHAVE_ROUND=1 -DHB_NO_FALLBACK_SHAPE -DHB_NO_MT -DHB_NO_UCD -DHB_NO_UNICODE_FUNCS -DMOZ_HAS_MOZGLUE -DMOZILLA_INTERNAL_API -DIMPL_LIBXUL -DSTATIC_EXPORTABLE_JS_API -I/NEW-SSD/NREF-COMM-CENTRAL/mozilla/gfx/harfbuzz/src -I/NEW-SSD/moz-obj-dir/objdir-tb3/gfx/harfbuzz/src -I/NEW-SSD/moz-obj-dir/objdir-tb3/dist/include -I/NEW-SSD/moz-obj-dir/objdir-tb3/dist/include/nspr -I/NEW-SSD/moz-obj-dir/objdir-tb3/dist/include/nss -fPIC -DMOZILLA_CLIENT -include /NEW-SSD/moz-obj-dir/objdir-tb3/mozilla-config.h -Wall -Wempty-body -Wignored-qualifiers -Woverloaded-virtual -Wpointer-arith -Wsign-compare -Wtype-limits -Wunreachable-code -Wwrite-strings -Wno-invalid-offsetof -Wc++2a-compat -Wduplicated-cond -Wimplicit-fallthrough -Wunused-function -Wunused-variable -Wno-error=maybe-uninitialized -Wno-error=deprecated-declarations -Wno-error=array-bounds -Wno-error=coverage-mismatch -Wno-error=free-nonheap-object -Wno-multistatement-macros -Wno-error=class-memaccess -Wno-error=deprecated-copy -Wformat -Wformat-overflow=2 -Wno-psabi -fno-sized-deallocation -fno-aligned-new -fno-builtin-strlen -Wl,--gdb-index -Dfdatasync=fdatasync -DDEBUG_4GB_CHECK -DUSEHELGRIND=1 -DUSEVALGRIND=1 -DDEBUG -g -gsplit-dwarf -Werror=sign-compare -Werror=unused-result -Werror=unused-variable -Werror=format -fuse-ld=gold -fno-exceptions -fno-strict-aliasing -fno-rtti -ffunction-sections -fdata-sections -fno-exceptions -fno-math-errno -pthread -pipe -g -g -Og -fvar-tracking -gdwarf-4 -fvar-tracking-assignments -freorder-blocks -fno-omit-frame-pointer -funwind-tables -I/usr/include/glib-2.0 -I/usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/glib-2.0/include -MD -MP -MF .deps/Unified_cpp_gfx_harfbuzz_src0.o.pp -fdiagnostics-color Unified_cpp_gfx_harfbuzz_src0.cpp
next reply other threads:[~2020-11-26 6:08 UTC|newest] Thread overview: 12+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top 2020-11-26 6:08 ishikawa at yk dot rim.or.jp [this message] 2020-11-26 6:11 ` [Bug ipa/98000] " ishikawa at yk dot rim.or.jp 2020-11-26 6:14 ` ishikawa at yk dot rim.or.jp 2020-11-26 9:36 ` marxin at gcc dot gnu.org 2020-11-26 10:17 ` marxin at gcc dot gnu.org 2020-11-26 10:18 ` [Bug ipa/98000] [10/11 Regression] ICE verify_cgraph_node failed since r10-7306-g72b3bc895f023bf4 marxin at gcc dot gnu.org 2020-11-26 13:37 ` ishikawa at yk dot rim.or.jp 2020-11-26 14:22 ` marxin at gcc dot gnu.org 2021-01-14 9:48 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org 2021-04-08 12:02 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org 2022-06-28 10:42 ` [Bug ipa/98000] [10/11/12/13 " jakub at gcc dot gnu.org 2023-07-07 10:38 ` [Bug ipa/98000] [11/12/13/14 " rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
Reply instructions: You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email using any one of the following methods: * Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client, and reply-to-all from there: mbox Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style * Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to switches of git-send-email(1): git send-email \ --in-reply-to=bug-98000-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/ \ --to=gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org \ --cc=gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org \ /path/to/YOUR_REPLY https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html * If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header via mailto: links, try the mailto: linkBe sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox; as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).