From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
Received: by sourceware.org (Postfix, from userid 48)
 id 99AD1393D034; Tue,  1 Dec 2020 10:58:11 +0000 (GMT)
DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 sourceware.org 99AD1393D034
From: "drikosev at gmail dot com" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug fortran/98016] Host association problem
Date: Tue, 01 Dec 2020 10:58:11 +0000
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC
X-Bugzilla-Type: changed
X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None
X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc
X-Bugzilla-Component: fortran
X-Bugzilla-Version: 11.0
X-Bugzilla-Keywords: rejects-valid
X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal
X-Bugzilla-Who: drikosev at gmail dot com
X-Bugzilla-Status: NEW
X-Bugzilla-Resolution: 
X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3
X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: pault at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: ---
X-Bugzilla-Flags: 
X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: attachments.created
Message-ID: <bug-98016-4-ZqEh1FiQRB@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
In-Reply-To: <bug-98016-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
References: <bug-98016-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-BeenThere: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Gcc-bugs mailing list <gcc-bugs.gcc.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://gcc.gnu.org/mailman/options/gcc-bugs>,
 <mailto:gcc-bugs-request@gcc.gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://gcc.gnu.org/pipermail/gcc-bugs/>
List-Post: <mailto:gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gcc-bugs-request@gcc.gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://gcc.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/gcc-bugs>,
 <mailto:gcc-bugs-request@gcc.gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 01 Dec 2020 10:58:11 -0000

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D98016

--- Comment #7 from Ev Drikos <drikosev at gmail dot com> ---
Created attachment 49659
  --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=3D49659&action=3Dedit
attachment for pr98016-07

(In reply to Paul Thomas from comment #6)
> Created attachment 49645 [details]
> Fix for the PR
>=20
> Unless there are objections, ...

Not an objection, rather just an observation:

1. This code is inside "resolve_symbol" and the
   following double declaration seems redundant:

   bool saved_specification_expr

   The reason I'm mentioning it is that I debugged
   the example with gcc-4.8 and the debugger makes
   this call:

   gfc_resolve_array_spec (sym->as, check_constant)

   So, the declaration below could be at the top of
   the function declarations like the code below=