From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: by sourceware.org (Postfix, from userid 48) id D81513857814; Wed, 10 Feb 2021 20:37:17 +0000 (GMT) DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 sourceware.org D81513857814 From: "dmalcolm at gcc dot gnu.org" To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org Subject: [Bug preprocessor/98021] #warning issues redundant diagnostic lines Date: Wed, 10 Feb 2021 20:37:17 +0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC X-Bugzilla-Type: changed X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc X-Bugzilla-Component: preprocessor X-Bugzilla-Version: 10.2.1 X-Bugzilla-Keywords: diagnostic X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal X-Bugzilla-Who: dmalcolm at gcc dot gnu.org X-Bugzilla-Status: NEW X-Bugzilla-Resolution: X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3 X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: --- X-Bugzilla-Flags: X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated MIME-Version: 1.0 X-BeenThere: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Gcc-bugs mailing list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 10 Feb 2021 20:37:18 -0000 https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D98021 --- Comment #17 from David Malcolm --- One aspect of the original case in comment #0 that hasn't been mentioned in this discussion is that the two #warning messages are related to each other= .=20 It looks to me like the author of those lines intended for them to emit a b= lock of related text, but the source-printing gets in the way of this and makes = the connection between the two messages less clear. I'm not sure what the best approach here is though.=