From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: by sourceware.org (Postfix, from userid 48) id A7595385803C; Tue, 5 Jan 2021 20:32:30 +0000 (GMT) DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 sourceware.org A7595385803C From: "ro at CeBiTec dot Uni-Bielefeld.DE" To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org Subject: [Bug testsuite/98225] gcc.misc-tests/outputs.exp ltrans_args tests FAIL Date: Tue, 05 Jan 2021 20:32:30 +0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC X-Bugzilla-Type: changed X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc X-Bugzilla-Component: testsuite X-Bugzilla-Version: 11.0 X-Bugzilla-Keywords: X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal X-Bugzilla-Who: ro at CeBiTec dot Uni-Bielefeld.DE X-Bugzilla-Status: UNCONFIRMED X-Bugzilla-Resolution: X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3 X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: 11.0 X-Bugzilla-Flags: X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated MIME-Version: 1.0 X-BeenThere: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Gcc-bugs mailing list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 05 Jan 2021 20:32:30 -0000 https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D98225 --- Comment #8 from ro at CeBiTec dot Uni-Bielefeld.DE --- > --- Comment #7 from Bernd Edlinger --- > when you leave just one of those tests, you can > get somewhat more verbose output by using something like that: > > make check-gcc-c RUNTESTFLAGS=3D"--target_board=3Dunix/-v/-Wl,-v outputs.= exp" I've just run the corresponding xgcc invocation manually. > you should see where the collect-ld is invoked: > > collect2 version 11.0.0 20210105 (experimental)^M > /home/ed/gnu/gcc-build/gcc/collect-ld @outputs.ld1_args^M > GNU ld (GNU Binutils) 2.35.1^M > > The arguments are in a response-file: @outputs.ld1_args > maybe that looks different for you? It certainly does (Solaris ld doesn't support -v, so no -Wl,-v here), as I found in collect2.c (do_link): the @ files are only passed if HAVE_GNU_LD and at_file_supplied. The former is certainly false for Solaris ld, so we'll certainly see no outputs.ld1_args passed.=